Whats a Good Donphan counter?

Status
Not open for further replies.
dooman58 said:
LOL. I think he means that you can lock them for 2 (OMG 2) if you don't run flygon, or switch, or warp point, or any other card.

But honestly, Bibarel isnt BAD. Dewgong is just BETTER.

If he used better grammar and actually posted his thoughts in a manner I could read, then none of this would be happening.

Really, who doesn't run some sort of card to get your Pokemon out of the active?
 
thepliskin5005 said:
i was talking about the water arecus that you commented on

That is so old news that it's decomposed. Water Arceus was trashed a long time ago. Really bad counter. Keep up.
 
sturtle said:
SPIRE_FAN said:
ummm ok first of all bibarel with an expert belt has 120 hp and will 60 damage straight to donphan, not just that but the attack lets you choose an attack for your opponent to not use A.K.A no earthquake so they have to start loading up 2 more energy and/or heavy impact then they would have to do earthquake for 60 and hurt there bench bibarel is an amazing card
but hey "thats just me" ;)
If it's such an amazing card, then why does no one use it? Burn. if Donphan really wanted too, he could be out of there and into a Flygon asap. Another Donphan could be waiting as well. I just think that Bibarel is too slow. Even with DCE.

Umbreon UD or Dewgong SV. Probably the best. But I found that a flailing Phanpy can easily knock out an Umbreon.

sturtle said:
dooman58 said:
LOL. I think he means that you can lock them for 2 (OMG 2) if you don't run flygon, or switch, or warp point, or any other card.

But honestly, Bibarel isnt BAD. Dewgong is just BETTER.

If he used better grammar and actually posted his thoughts in a manner I could read, then none of this would be happening.

Really, who doesn't run some sort of card to get your Pokemon out of the active?

your concluding answers are to narrow minded and might hurt you 1 day just becuase a card isnt quote "played" dpesnt mean its bad thats how new decks/cards are introduced every card had to start some where my friend

PS: ooooo so he mightv miss-spelled some words wrong...SO WHAT?! im pretty sure thats something very easy to read awell

but thats just me ;)
 
SPIRE_FAN said:
If it's such an amazing card, then why does no one use it? Burn. if Donphan really wanted too, he could be out of there and into a Flygon asap. Another Donphan could be waiting as well. I just think that Bibarel is too slow. Even with DCE.

Umbreon UD or Dewgong SV. Probably the best. But I found that a flailing Phanpy can easily knock out an Umbreon.

sturtle said:
If he used better grammar and actually posted his thoughts in a manner I could read, then none of this would be happening.

Really, who doesn't run some sort of card to get your Pokemon out of the active?

your concluding answers are to narrow minded and might hurt you 1 day just becuase a card isnt quote "played" dpesnt mean its bad thats how new decks/cards are introduced every card had to start some where my friend

PS: ooooo so he mightv miss-spelled some words wrong...SO WHAT?! im pretty sure thats something very easy to read awell

but thats just me ;)
[/quote]

You just proved how bad grammar makes you sound stupid. Oh wait, that was the thought behind your post.

I am not narrow-minded. I give every card a chance, but if it isn't good, then I throw it to the dogs. Houndoom Prime isn't good. Simple. that's not being narrow minded, that's just fact. The fact that people are fighting me on this is ridiculous.

As soon as a card is released, it is analyzed. You see cards all over GD, being critqued by member of Pokebeach. If that card has potential, then they talk about it. If it doesn't, then it is usually just left alone. No one has ever made a thread about Bibarel SF, or Water Arceus, because they are not very good cards. Simple.

Let me get this straight, you're saying that if a card isn't played, it might still be good? are you kidding me? THAT'S THE ENTIRE POINT TO POKEMON. If a card is good, it is used. If a card is not, it is not used. You obviously are new to Pokemon, because that is common sense.

Grammar is the glue that holds together a post. Without it, your thought falls apart. People don't take you seriously if you have bad spelling/grammar skills. Trust me, grammar makes a big difference in understanding the post. I didn't understand his post, because it was poorly thought out and the message was jumbled. You're grammar was atrocious as well and made the entire post hard to read. Try a little harder next time.
 
Um Yes. If a card isn't played it is still good. It all depends on the situation. When Garchomp C came out. It wasn't nearly as popular as it was after DCE came out. Dialga Chomp and Luxchomp all saw Major play when DCE came out. Did you know that Garchomp, Dialga G and Luxray had all been out together for about 2 sets before DCE came out. Did that mean that Garchomp was bad? no. It was a good card but the format at its time wasn't using its true potential. Bibarel is a good Donphan counter. you say they will just retreat with Flygon or Warp point or whatever... if that happens the Bibarel player also has their options. When was the last time Flygon was popular after Luxchomp became dominant?
 
This is a ridiculous argument. Why would you play a stage 1 pokemon that needs double colourless energy to be effective for the purpose of destroying a single pokemon. You will almost never have the cards to pull this off, and if you do, Bibarel is going down after a single attack. I have played Donphan decks before, and a good player will have some way of swapping their active Donphan for one on the bench, whether this is switch, Flygon, or super scoop up. Then it should become immediately clear that you are screwed, because he will attack for 90 damage (60 +30 weakness) which is just 10 shy from a knock out. This problem can be solved in a number of ways, all of which are usually abused by Donphan decks. Crobat G, expert Belt, and pluspower are good examples. Either way, your tech, and keep in mind that the purpose of a tech is too immediately ruin the card you are teching against (Whether it quickly knocks out that pokemon, or just prevents it from doing any damage), has just done 20 damage and given up a prize card.

I agree with the argument that a card that is not used can still be good. But by no means whatsoever, is Bibarel SV a good tech against Donphan.


Oh and just for your amusement,
SPIRE_FAN said:
ooooo so he mightv miss-spelled some words wrong...

"misspelling a word wrong" is considered a double negative and, therefore, you are claiming that he spelled every word right, which he didn't. LOL :p
Using proper grammar and spelling ensures that people don't misinterpret what you are trying to say.

Don't dig yourself a hole that you can't climb out of, you're needlessly fighting with someone who is only trying to help you and getting frustrated when you insult his advice for no good reason.
 
I don't agree with that. If a certain card relies on another card, then does that make the card good? Or does that make the combo good? Neither Garchomp or Luxray would be very popular if they didn't have each other and DCE. Bibarel isn't a great card, but it can use DCE in the same manner, making it a card that needs support. Donphan, for example, can survive on it's own, making it a good card. Donphan still needs support, but it can support itself. If a card isn't good, then it doesn't get recognition. If Garchomp wasn't a great combo with Luxray and DCE, then it would not get as much recognition.
 
sturtle said:
I don't agree with that. If a certain card relies on another card, then does that make the card good? Or does that make the combo good? Neither Garchomp or Luxray would be very popular if they didn't have each other and DCE. Bibarel isn't a great card, but it can use DCE in the same manner, making it a card that needs support. Donphan, for example, can survive on it's own, making it a good card. Donphan still needs support, but it can support itself. If a card isn't good, then it doesn't get recognition. If Garchomp wasn't a great combo with Luxray and DCE, then it would not get as much recognition.
Thinking like that will get you beat by some rogue deck. The most dangerous decks out there are the ones that are hardly use. If you don't see what's coming, you can easily lose. All I'm saying is that I'll laugh if someone wins a major event with houndoom prime.

If he wants to use houndoom prime then let him. Trying to get him not to isn't really helping.
 
scuba stevee said:
Thinking like that will get you beat by some rogue deck. The most dangerous decks out there are the ones that are hardly use. If you don't see what's coming, you can easily lose. All I'm saying is that I'll laugh if someone wins a major event with houndoom prime.

If he wants to use houndoom prime then let him. Trying to get him not to isn't really helping.

But if he continues to fight me then I will fight back. With big paragraphs.

I apologize for calling underplayed cards bad, that was my bad. I had forgotten about the power of rogue. IMA SO SORRY!

Houndoom Prime will never, EVER, win a tourney. Unless all the players are n00bs.
 
sturtle said:
But if he continues to fight me then I will fight back. With big paragraphs.

I apologize for calling underplayed cards bad, that was my bad. I had forgotten about the power of rogue. IMA SO SORRY!

Houndoom Prime will never, EVER, win a tourney. Unless all the players are n00bs.
OMG BIG PARAGRAPHS!!!! Well let me tell you, I'm so glad that you can put together enough sentences to form a "big paragraph", that I'm just going to bow down to your greatness, all mighty big paragraph writer! Yeah, big paragraphs doesn't make you sound smart champ.

Ah now you can tell the future! You're so amazing.

The point I'm making is you can't be prepared for the unexpected. You can be using the best cards in the game, but then get beat by something you just didn't see coming, like oh so crappy houndoom prime. If you think using Luxchomp or whatever makes you invincible, then you are sadly mistaken.

Edit: Lol, dmaster, I think you should of locked this thread.
 
sturtle said:
But if he continues to fight me then I will fight back. With big paragraphs.

I apologize for calling underplayed cards bad, that was my bad. I had forgotten about the power of rogue. IMA SO SORRY!

Houndoom Prime will never, EVER, win a tourney. Unless all the players are n00bs.

Wait... since when is 10-16 lines a big paragraph... I must have missed something in the last 12 years of school.....

Also, I wasn't aware you could see the future and you do know that several rogue players go to worlds each year along with some winning nationals.

And I agree with Scuba this should be locked =X
 
scuba stevee said:
OMG BIG PARAGRAPHS!!!! Well let me tell you, I'm so glad that you can put together enough sentences to form a "big paragraph", that I'm just going to bow down to your greatness, all mighty big paragraph writer! Yeah, big paragraphs doesn't make you sound smart champ.

Ah now you can tell the future! You're so amazing.

The point I'm making is you can't be prepared for the unexpected. You can be using the best cards in the game, but then get beat by something you just didn't see coming, like oh so crappy houndoom prime. If you think using Luxchomp or whatever makes you invincible, then you are sadly mistaken.

Edit: Lol, dmaster, I think you should of locked this thread.

Big paragraphs do make me sound smart, BECAUSE I AM SMART!!!

Oh, and don't ever call me champ. Ever. Or I will call you buddy, or my friend, after a condescending message. Okay, buddy?

Yeah. I went there. Bu Houndoom would need to be played well, and the only people who would play Houndoom prime would be young and gullible. And easily beatable.
 
Yeah, you're probably right now, scuba stevee. Especially after everyone just added fuel to the fire. The immense fire that Houndoom is burning. Let me just say one final thing, Steelix Prime won a BR. It's possible Houndoom could, somehow.

*Locked*

dmaster out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top