I didn't grow up with the 4th gen though, I grew up with the 2nd and 3rd. I bet you started with 4th too. The Pokemon designs look like they came from Digimon. and I said ALMOST like minigames. The three on three battles look like a minigame for me and later I'll relook at the rest of the information and go on with it later.frostwind said:what minigames? i see the transfering pokemon but thats it. new people love the 5th gen and so do the ones from the beginning. the people who hate all of the 5th gen sadly grew up with 4th gen. thats all they no so they arent used to the balance of simplistic and detailed designs imo. poor them.
And i hate that you're trying to tell me my opinion is wrong, you should stop assuming I grew up with the 4th gen. I bet you did thoughfrostwind said:thats what im saying. a lot of people though, who started with gen4 only like that style. they don't get how good a pokemon can be when its detailed, simple or really one of those.
LordMuha said:I guess. What really annoys me is when people say a new Pokémon looks like a Digimon. Adding to your point generation V is more close to Gen. I that IV is; in terms of the Pokémon designs I mean.
I don't understand why people moan about the game developers adding new features and stuff to the games. Let's face it, if the games remained as they were in RBY with mere graphical updates the franchise would have failed years ago.
In some way I suppose we've got GSC to blame. It was so similar to RBY that must have automatically assumed that's how the series would be. There's nothing wrong with GSC; I'm purely making a point.
New features ARE fun. The Pokemon do look like they came Digimon. I mean yeah, each gen should have unique Pokemon, but I'm not getting a feel for the designs. And the whole point of this thread is to express your opinion. And how is it GSC's fault? It was what made gen 2 the greatest gen (second goes to gen 3). GSC isn't even that similar. And even then you still can't blame them, that was TWO gens ago.
LordMuha said:Fun they are. I can't comment on Pokémon looking like Digimon because in two franchises based around similar ideas things are bound to look similar; there's really no valid argument against it. Pokémon look like Digimon, and vice versa.
The similarities between Gen I and II are far closer than any of the other generations. And because they came out fairly close together, with few minor changes - why change what's good? - people must have gotten some expectations of how the series may have continued. Even I'll admit that Generation III was a shock - both positively and negatively.
Going back to what you said about the Pokémon designs. You've made clear your opinions on the look of the new Pokémon and I've made mine. It just seems they're both different.
Tyrant, other than the designs of some or all of the new Pokémon what else makes you dislike the new Generation? Or are you completely put off by that alone? ^_^