“Pokemon Card Game MEGA” Trademarked, Goodbye “Scarlet & Violet!”

They look fine to me? I really can't tell what y'all are jawing about. I do like the thicker borders of WOTC better though because it looks more like a frame. I really hate TCGs that have no borders
Here's a side by side comparison of the english yellow and japanese grey borders, with the foiling details present in the picture (I took them from google search, results seem to be from eBay listings)
1741319396972.png1741319667673.png
The yellow border does not blend well with the radiant foil. It takes away the highlight from the card itself and forces you to stare at the borders. It's terrible contrast.
 
Here's a side by side comparison of the english yellow and japanese grey borders, with the foiling details present in the picture (I took them from google search, results seem to be from eBay listings)
View attachment 20537View attachment 20539
The yellow border does not blend well with the radiant foil. It takes away the highlight from the card itself and forces you to stare at the borders. It's terrible contrast.
I will say I think the silver borders should stay for holographic pokemon,

anyway it'll be very funny if Lillie's Clefairy ex came out as a Psychic type right before Fairy Type came back, making it super useful in anti-Dragapault decks
 
I will say I think the silver borders should stay for holographic pokemon,

anyway it'll be very funny if Lillie's Clefairy ex came out as a Psychic type right before Fairy Type came back, making it super useful in anti-Dragapault decks
if you think pink would come back and not come back with the mega gardevoir as the face (or feature in trailers hyping the new series up at all) i'm afraid you are beyond help. it's not coming back.
 
You have been conditioned or been led to believe that this kind of comment is fine and normal but let me assure you it is not. This kind of behaviour will hold you back.
You have been conditioned or been led to believe that the lack of extremely basic reading skills and reasonable logical deduction is fine and normal but let me assure you it is not. This kind of behaviour will hold you back.
 
if you think pink would come back and not come back with the mega gardevoir as the face (or feature in trailers hyping the new series up at all) i'm afraid you are beyond help. it's not coming back.
Gardevoir is also a psychic type. Could have Mega Mawile, Mega Altaria, Mega Audino, Mega Diancie,

Or could have TWO Mega Gardevoir because gotta sell stuff.
 
I would love for them to bring back fairy types, but I feel that (and this also seems to be the general opinion) gray borders are a huge improvement. Having a border color that is plain and neutral (like gray) seems like the best option to me.
 
Ok thanks for clarifying, I’m new to the TCG. But on several occasions on this site my honest queries have been met with snarkiness and/or hostility, what is going on with that?? Just be nice, please.
Yeah, that happens. I'm sorry that it happens, but that's the internet sometimes I suppose. I always try to talk online as if I were talking in person to a friend, which helps me somewhat to be respectful and considerate, but I'm not very good at it and I will get caught up in the heat of the moment just as much as the next person.
 
fairy type could have worked but also i think supporting a new type so late in the games life is always going to be annoying, much more so for the tcg than the games (who can retcon a bunch of things to now be the new type and have a good design base). i think its fair to want to pivot back to the old design for consistency. im neutral on the card colors. pink looked good with some pokemon and less so with others, just like most border colors other than colorless (which looks good with 99% of pokemon) and metal
 
It's strange how this transition is handled. I had presumed that we would have a dedicated ZA block, similar to what we had with HGSS, but I didn't expect it until 2026.

On the other hand, there's a huge difference compared with the old days. Firstly, the Western expansions now have a simultaneous release, whereas before the English and French versions were released with quite a delay (this is just one example), and the delta between the Western and Japanese versions is no longer as long.
Secondly, a certain release mechanism, more routine I'd say, was put in place during the BW block and took shape on XY. We're used to having around 3 years of life on a block, containing 12 main expansions, with themes per year, but always following the content of the games. What's more, since the XY era, more and more secondary expansions have been added.

This routine has been established precisely because video games have been released simultaneously all over the world since XY. Games are usually released in November, so it's only logical that the TCG blocks should start at the beginning of the following year, with releases in February, May, August and November for the main expansions (although this has changed a little on the SV block, because of the “.5s” galore). However, one thing has NEVER changed since the beginning of the TCG: expansions are ALWAYS released after games. The games are the showcase of the license and allow the TCG to exist.

So I'm more than a little wary of the fact that the ZA block will still be released in 2025. This would mean that the SV block would only contain 10 or 11 main expansions, something we haven't seen since BW. What's more, with the game being released at the end of the year, it would be completely unprecedented for a block and expansions to be released BEFORE the game itself.
And yet, there's one unmistakable detail: it's indeed the year 2025 that can be seen in the legal notices at the bottom of the M-Lucario and M-Gardevoir cards...

So I'm a bit confused. I agree that 9G was poorly managed and that the critical reception up to SV7 was mixed. The games' content having been fully exploited, the latest expansions (SV9 and SV10) are there to fill the gap, but I don't understand the point of bringing back the trainer’s Pokémon theme only to abandon it after two expansions. Similarly, I can't imagine that the block will end with a “.5” dedicated to 5G.

One last thing, a few weeks ago in France we had a leak of a release schedule apparently from an employee working at the TCG's French distributor. It shows SV11 for September and SV12 for November.
Strangely, there's no mention of December on the calendar. Would this mean a December release for the first ZA block extension? Again, that would be a first.

Many uncertainties, inconsistencies and unanswered questions.
What is certain is that the ZA block will live until early 2027, when the 10G block should arrive. And in 2026, we'll obviously have a “.5” extension for the 30 years.
 
It's strange how this transition is handled. I had presumed that we would have a dedicated ZA block, similar to what we had with HGSS, but I didn't expect it until 2026.

On the other hand, there's a huge difference compared with the old days. Firstly, the Western expansions now have a simultaneous release, whereas before the English and French versions were released with quite a delay (this is just one example), and the delta between the Western and Japanese versions is no longer as long.
Secondly, a certain release mechanism, more routine I'd say, was put in place during the BW block and took shape on XY. We're used to having around 3 years of life on a block, containing 12 main expansions, with themes per year, but always following the content of the games. What's more, since the XY era, more and more secondary expansions have been added.

This routine has been established precisely because video games have been released simultaneously all over the world since XY. Games are usually released in November, so it's only logical that the TCG blocks should start at the beginning of the following year, with releases in February, May, August and November for the main expansions (although this has changed a little on the SV block, because of the “.5s” galore). However, one thing has NEVER changed since the beginning of the TCG: expansions are ALWAYS released after games. The games are the showcase of the license and allow the TCG to exist.

So I'm more than a little wary of the fact that the ZA block will still be released in 2025. This would mean that the SV block would only contain 10 or 11 main expansions, something we haven't seen since BW. What's more, with the game being released at the end of the year, it would be completely unprecedented for a block and expansions to be released BEFORE the game itself.
And yet, there's one unmistakable detail: it's indeed the year 2025 that can be seen in the legal notices at the bottom of the M-Lucario and M-Gardevoir cards...

So I'm a bit confused. I agree that 9G was poorly managed and that the critical reception up to SV7 was mixed. The games' content having been fully exploited, the latest expansions (SV9 and SV10) are there to fill the gap, but I don't understand the point of bringing back the trainer’s Pokémon theme only to abandon it after two expansions. Similarly, I can't imagine that the block will end with a “.5” dedicated to 5G.

One last thing, a few weeks ago in France we had a leak of a release schedule apparently from an employee working at the TCG's French distributor. It shows SV11 for September and SV12 for November.
Strangely, there's no mention of December on the calendar. Would this mean a December release for the first ZA block extension? Again, that would be a first.

Many uncertainties, inconsistencies and unanswered questions.
What is certain is that the ZA block will live until early 2027, when the 10G block should arrive. And in 2026, we'll obviously have a “.5” extension for the 30 years.
By the third year the expansions really stop being super generational focused. And gen IX has nothing to keep “sustaining” it. Sun Moon had let’s go and SWSH had PLA at the very least. And just like gen VI they probably see another fitting time to exploit megas popularities for a longer time. And sets 11 and 12 might be mega but they don’t have to be ( and probably won’t be) PLZA that could still start until 2026. We’ll have to see until end of the year to see what the theme is for the high end class set and what they plan to do there tho, maybe they’ll just ignore megas and celebrate partner pokemon but idk. I don’t understand the mention of December don’t we always skip that month here? Like we don’t release anything that month
 
Back
Top