Oh, it does? I thought it took less time than that.
I can make a good vote that I feel is the best option now
It might be different for other people but that's the case for me.but for now I don't have the time to get info via pressuring
In that case you are scum and nobody can convince me otherwise.What if he flips scum and Naga is somehow town?
Huh...Not with Nick's motion detector, since he couldn't actually see who/how many players visited his target, only that they were visited, which is no help at all. With motion detector, the tracker half is what matters.
Was this post made before or after Post #220? And was there a quote it was replying to?
Well then apparently I am nobody.In that case you are scum and nobody can convince me otherwise.
Was this post made before or after Post #220? And was there a quote it was replying to?
Quoting the same post naga quoted a post after.
I chose NP as my target because I was reading him as neutral at the time and wanted to have a better idea of how to approach the game moving forward. By targeting NP, I have the ability to better solidify a read as to his alignment, something that anyone can have trouble with when reading a more experienced player. By doing that, I minimize the chance of misreading.@TeamAqua4Life #HEYNICK, why did you choose NP as your target N1
NP and I were debating whether your tracking ability is better used at scum suspects or townleans. From what I understand, you did it because you read him as neutral, yes? In that case... well, it does not matter anymore at this point to be honest. NP convinced me that he is town, so the only possible way for him to be scum is if you are scum.I chose NP as my target because I was reading him as neutral at the time and wanted to have a better idea of how to approach the game moving forward. By targeting NP, I have the ability to better solidify a read as to his alignment, something that anyone can have trouble with when reading a more experienced player. By doing that, I minimize the chance of misreading.
Wouldn't that basically mean that we are in LYLO?Attention: There is a way this game can potentially end if you Mislynch today.
A very specific condition that I missed. So, lynching a scum is crucial today. Again, it is not guaranteed that town loses if they mislynch today.
Wouldn't that basically mean that we are in LYLO?
Was this post made before or after Post #220? And was there a quote it was replying to?
Quoting the same post naga quoted a post after.
Just defining it to make sure we are at the same page because Iam always confused with the terms Mylo/lylo
A mislynch COULD end the game. Not Will end the game. Which is LYLO , yeah.
MYLO is mislynch-and-lose while LYLO is lynch-or-lose. MYLO means that we lose if we mislynch, which could be prevented by No Lynch, but would make the following day LYLO. Dunno what state we are in though.Just defining it to make sure we are at the same page because Iam always confused with the terms Mylo/lylo
MYLO is mislynch-and-lose while LYLO is lynch-or-lose. MYLO means that we lose if we mislynch, which could be prevented by No Lynch, but would make the following day LYLO. Dunno what state we are in though.
Attention: There is a way this game can potentially end if you Mislynch today.
A very specific condition that I missed. So, lynching a scum is crucial today. Again, it is not guaranteed that town loses if they mislynch today.
Oh. Well that sums it up then.We are in mylo.
Thanks for correcting me in private.