Finished Mafia XXXIX: Superheroes Vs Supervillains - Mafia has won!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Day 1: Votecount 2

The people who are being voted are in chronological order

8 votes for a majority

The player with the most votes is tagged

If you think there’s anything wrong, just ask

EeveeTheFishey 0: Lord o da rings (vote)
NinjaPenguin 2: Vracken (vote) | Celever (vote)
Professor Palutena 2: Celever (vote) | Little Cherrim (vote) | rainyman123 (vote) | Lord o da Rings (vote) | PikaMasterJesi (vote) | Celever (vote) | rainyman123 (vote)
Vracken 1: mirdo (vote) |
@PikaMasterJesi 4: Quakingpunch73 (vote) | Tempest (vote) | NinjaPenguin (vote) | Professor Palutena (vote)
mirdo 0: NinjaPenguin (vote) |
Little Cherrim 0: NinjaPenguin (vote) | rainyman123 (vote) |
quakingpunch73 1: Blakers (vote) |
Blakers 1: TheSceptileMaster (vote) |
Tempest 0: PikaMasterJesi (vote) |
Celever 0: Professor Palutena (vote) |
rainyman123 2: PikaMasterJesi (vote) | Lord o da rings (vote)

Not Voting: EeveeTheFishey |

Day 1 ends in roughly 27 hours on Friday 5pm EST
 
The reason I haven't been posting much, is that I don't feel I can contribute to the discussion much. If you fellows would like, I could try.
 
Little Cherrim said:
The reason I haven't been posting much, is that I don't feel I can contribute to the discussion much. If you fellows would like, I could try.
Click to expand...
This is something I've definitely fallen victim to, so I can understand how you feel. Just try to throw in your thoughts on anything.

Who do you think is the best lynch candidate right now, and why?
 
丅ᗴᗰᑭᗴᔕ丅 said:
Oops, forgot to talk about lord o.


Bending to the demands of others.


Again, bending to the demands of others.

Slight bandwagon, but is being productive.

This feels a bit scummy, as she has just gone with the opinions of everyone else. NP points out that voting an inactive is counterproductive, so she changes it. Rainy points out that PP was an easy RVS target because he'd accumulated the most votes, so she votes for him. The *sigh* she makes feels a bit weary and irritated, which I don't like, either. Then she drops in a post basically saying what others have said, then drops off. She might just think that there isn't anything to say, thus the lack of posting, or feels annoyed that everyone is commenting on her RVS unproductivity and doesn't feel the need to justify. Then again, she could be scum bending to the demands of others to deflect suspicion, then making a small, unmemorable post that bandwagons on what everyone else has said to avoid being accused as an inactive, then dropping off with posting once PP, NP, Celever, and Jesi started firing off at each other. She was online this morning, so I'd like to hear her thoughts.
Click to expand...

Well with NP, I'm going to say he was in the right. RVS is a time of testing the waters, see if you can get a reaction that can start by randomly voting for people. NP was in the right, but after I removed my vote, I guess I just couldn't be bothered with the game simply because of how hectic my life has been for the past week.

You're correct I was fairly annoyed with people commenting on my inactivity, but I decided I'd just vote and be done with it. This wasn't a good week for me to start on just because of how many tests I'll be taking tomorrow. This was on Monday, and I remember being very frustrated with life because of something major that happened at school that affected me in a negative way. I guess I was frustrated with being criticized for not giving my full attention, and the timing was just off for me to really get into the game. It's been a busy, and very frustrating week for me.

But on the other hand you're also right that I don't have much to say. I'm trying to get reads on people at the moment, and I won't be able to make any valuable discussion points until I think I have a read on someone as being scummy. Right now I have no scum readings that couldn't be seen as "the way they play" so I've got nothing :/

Also, @scattered mind and @double o squirtle this a notice that I am going on a school trip out of town from Monday to Thursday of next week, and will be fairly inactive. I will try to come on every once in a while, but I'm not making any promises.
 
PikaMasterJesi said:
Can you go deeper into this? I think my defence has actually been better so far than in previous games, or at least, it isn't riddled with AtE.
Click to expand...
I forgot to reply to this earlier. I'm actually surprised in a good way by the fact that your defense is not riddled with AtE. For me, the issue is that you were dodging questions.
丅ᗴᗰᑭᗴᔕ丅 said:
Celever has been defending Jesi and been pretty lenient on the newbies so fa
Click to expand...
From what I've seen, Celever almost always defends newbies and those who he considers an "easy lynch." It's nothing new.
Celever said:
You're the culprit; he's the possibly-in-on-it-and-more-fun-to-pressure-maybe-victim.
Click to expand...
The only scum read I agree with Prof. P on is Jesi. I've just focused much of my effort towards pressuring her. Also, how much did I buddy when I was scum in your game?
 
No clue how much you buddied. It's of little relevance to me. A smart scum changes their playstyle since the last time they were scum.

I defend people who are being targeted unfairly, which coincides but is not mutually exclusive with newer players.
 
NinjaPenguin said:
I forgot to reply to this earlier. I'm actually surprised in a good way by the fact that your defense is not riddled with AtE. For me, the issue is that you were dodging questions.
Click to expand...
I'm a little confused as to why you replied to something that wasn't directed at you (considering I'd quoted PP's post for that), but any good words, I'll take. :p
I don't think I was necessarily dodging questions (I think I'd either answered the question or forgot to do so), but I got to them, despite being a little late.

NinjaPenguin said:
The only scum read I agree with Prof. P on is Jesi.
Click to expand...
What are your current scum reads, aside from on me?
 
PikaMasterJesi said:
I'm a little confused as to why you replied to something that wasn't directed at you (considering I'd quoted PP's post for that)
Click to expand...
My vote was still on you. If I found your defense good enough, I would have switched my vote.
PikaMasterJesi said:
What are your current scum reads, aside from on me?
Click to expand...
Besides you, the scumreads are very light. Lord has done some scummy stuff, but it fits her meta pretty well and she looks to be improving. Quaking has been lurking a lot while not posting, which correlates with him being scum. Blakers has been nowhere near as helpful/contributing as he has been in the past, but it's Day 1 and he has no TGK to constantly tag him, so there's plenty of time for that to change.
 
So should I assume I'm getting lynched at this point? I'm not actually too sure what I can do to get myself out of this position.
 
Can people start casting their votes? We have less than 12 hours left, and we need to get as much info as possible to start Day 2.
 
Great idea! Personally I recommend voting for NP. I've got free cake for everyone who jumps on the bandwagon! ^w^
 
PikaMasterJesi said:
I'll bite. Cake's pretty good. What flavour is it, Cel? :p

##Unvote
##Vote: NinjaPenguin
Click to expand...
You haven't explained why you're voting NinjaPenguin, unless you're just trying to redirect the attention to him and hope everyone is going to bandwagon. Like PP said, I think the best way to save yourself is to make a case on someone else. Then again, not a lot of people have acted very scummy or have been completely inactive, so right now I think you might be the best lynch option in the eyes of a lot of the active players. My vote stays on you for now, but there are other somewhat scummy players that I'm looking into, since you read to me as simply defeated and now scrambling for other people to lynch.

Also, I hate cake.
 
I do like myself some cake...

No but srsly. We might actually wanna have some organized voting. Either we "agree" on making it a draw. So everybody lives. Or we seriously vote a lamb into the slaughter house.
So i would suggest that everybody who had at least 2 votes at the second vote count might wanna make a case against himself maybe?
Else we're not gonna get anywhere.
 
I was ready to unvote Jesi and test the NP case but then this happened...
PikaMasterJesi said:
I'll bite. Cake's pretty good. What flavour is it, Cel? :p

##Unvote
##Vote: NinjaPenguin
Click to expand...

mirdo said:
I do like myself some cake...

No but srsly. We might actually wanna have some organized voting. Either we "agree" on making it a draw. So everybody lives. Or we seriously vote a lamb into the slaughter house.
So i would suggest that everybody who had at least 2 votes at the second vote count might wanna make a case against himself maybe?
Else we're not gonna get anywhere.
Click to expand...
This isn't effective when it comes to killing scum.
 
How is "Have the suspicious people defend themself and decide after" not effective when it comes to killing scum?

I agree to the cake part not really beeing that effective
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top