Finished Mafia XXXVII: Celever's School Grades ~ Game Over!

Status
Not open for further replies.
But no one said Jesi's wagon was a bad idea until I just said it was. And only bb said we should drop it. That's hardly "most of us." You're trying too hard to look town.
It's implied people think the Jesi wagon is bad by not voting for it. People don't vote for wagons that are bad. I figured that was common sense.

You're trying too hard to make this look the way you want it to look.

You're just keeping your vote on an old wagon, you're not actually engaging in it. Am I wrong? Would you not consider your behavior tunneling?
We might have different definitions of engage then. It sounds like, for you, engaging would require putting a vote down on the wagon. That's no longer engagement to me; that's commitment to the wagon.

Please don't hammer me while i'm asleep :p I have some vital knowledge you ought to wait for. Do you really think I would go around insulting people without some kind of back up?
Does this stunt ever work?

This is a classic scum move of "don't lynch me I have info!" in hopes of getting town to spare him in hopes of living another day and redirecting a mislynch.

Plus, if it was so vital, why not share it earlier?

Okay, reading back, Robin is really all over the place. Could be scum, could be town. I'm not feeling particularly convinced either way. So... a decent lynch option, but I think that Professor P or Wailord will more likely net scum.
Can you explain the Wailord case for me? I'm not seeing anything scummy about him.
 
Is OMGUS scummy?

You sound you like don't particularly like the lynch. Who do you think is better?


How?

Yes you are right, I don't particularly like the lynch.

However, with such a limited amount of information day 1, that was what I concluded as the best lynch for information.

It can be beneficial because
a) We don't have to deal with the person who basically dislikes everyone else here atm
b) People won't be confused as to "what is this arrogant town/scum/whatnot doing" <- his previous actions didn't really help the town tbh, but that could and hopefully will improve.
c) His role will explain why he acted the way he did (at least it should!?), and in response, see how the others made it to their favor in lynching him. (If he flips town, vs if he flips scum, tells something about the other people that participated in D1).
---
This also goes with Point C, but a lynch is definitely more helpful than no lynch. As such, Robin is my logical decision because of those above reasons and because his actions are soooooo confusing. [He does make himself seem important, but why not share the importance instead of just stating something is important!!]
----

The other options that are talked about

- Pika, it was basically concluded that she plays exactly the same every game with no improvement? so, doesn't really say much.
- Wailord, I haven't gone and analyzed his stuff actually, let me do that after this post. Didn't seem to have a strong case from what I remember about reading.
- PP, has a scum ever received a neighborhood role!? <- someone please answer that? I don't know. obviously, he could be lying to make us trust him, but he was the first to partially reveal role.

So of the options, Robin was my most logical choice?
 
Can you explain the Wailord case for me? I'm not seeing anything scummy about him.

I think Im a little uncertain about this too.

It seemed that he didn't post a lot, and he only had 1 thing that Ninja pointed out if I remember correctly.

But he hasn't posted much or at all for the last 24 hours either so....
 
It's implied people think the Jesi wagon is bad by not voting for it. People don't vote for wagons that are bad. I figured that was common sense.
But lots of people were voting for the Jesi wagon?

Can you explain the Wailord case for me? I'm not seeing anything scummy about him.
My initial case is here.

Basically:
- Echoing
- Not making his own contributions
- His weird TSM logic + banwagoning
- He's disappeared

Similar to Robin I guess, but again I think the strange way Robin has been acting is characteristic. Hence why I think Wailord is a better lynch.
 
- PP, has a scum ever received a neighborhood role!? <- someone please answer that? I don't know. obviously, he could be lying to make us trust him, but he was the first to partially reveal role.
Neighbours are typically town, but scum can easily have them too, so I don't think it tells much.
 
But lots of people were voting for the Jesi wagon?


My initial case is here.

Basically:
- Echoing
- Not making his own contributions
- His weird TSM logic + banwagoning
- He's disappeared

Similar to Robin I guess, but again I think the strange way Robin has been acting is characteristic. Hence why I think Wailord is a better lynch.

##VOTE: Wailord_2

for now, rather than closing the hammer onto Robin, (at least until he gets a chance to respond).

Please respond @Wailord_2
 
K here's scattered mind's ISO.

First thing I want to point out is that he hasn't voted at all today, despite all the posting he's done. Think of that what you will, but I find it suspicious with how much he's talked about stuff. I actually had to check the vote count on page 18 to make sure I didn't miss any posts.

scattered mind has also rarely offered his opinions and stances on today's events. Instead, he's been trying to prod more info out of people, which feigns participation in my opinion. This can be seen through

Wasn't your case on him that he unvoted everytime you called him for bandwagoning?
You said you read him as town because of bandwagoning, which may not be common on new scum players, so your point about him unvoting after being called out is nothing? @bbninjas
Ok, although I don't think it is true in TAE's case. It looks to me that he kinda knows what he's doing.
So you mean that you are not going to scumhunt at all ? You just wait for a case, and if there is no case that you like, then you simply do nothing?
scattered mind said:
@PikaMasterJesi - What do you think about the points on Robin?
Why is that? You were very confident he is scummy.
I don't understand, which one is it?
Can you explain the contradiction?
Why did you unvote Jesi?
This wall of quotes is a collection of sm's oneliners. It's barely anything.

While all of this questioning is fine, there's something missing here that I find quite interesting. Like I alluded to above, sm hasn't offered his thoughts on the game yet, yet he's highly fascinated by what other players think. This reads to me like he's afraid of participating, and instead is more interested in what everyone else thinks. It's like he's trying to hide.

Ok, wow Jesi, you said you are going to wait for Wailord to answer, but then you vote after someone else voted? And then you unvote because everyone else unvoted? This is the same scummy behavior you had that almost got me lynched last game. I am saying this in the nicest way : Stop mindlessly bandwagoning. I promise you, it's a lot more fun to play with critical thinking. Or just thinking. The fact that you act the same like when you were town is not going to hold water forever, so stop saying I will learn (noticed how you pull that sentense the first time in this game after I said that is what you used to say last game) and AtE. I am going to read the last game you have played because I am pretty sure you did improve during the game.

@TheSceptileMaster - Are you going to answer my question?
This doesn't fit with the one liners in terms of length, but it's the same general thing. This is classic sm commentating on someone else's actions, which is what he's done in the above quotes. He's yet to actually say anything of substance, because he's so focused on Jesi's play comparing it from last game.

Jesi's acting very similar to how she acted in the last game she'd played. However, I expect her to learn from her mistakes (e.g stating that the RVS is over, which is exactly what happened last game she played and she was also called for it), especially after almost every time someone accused her she said she will learn for the next time. So this might be her trying to act like she played last game as town, and use ATE ("I always end up looking scummy").

So we have thoughts on the game finally, but I really don't know how to read it. It's so entrenched in the last game that I don't feel confident in calling it his thoughts on the current game. With the above post, I really want to know why sm is so concerned about Jesi's meta.

FYI, the quote above where he asks Jesi about the points on Robin is from here. I moved it up there because it better fit, but that's why it's link won't work up there.

I think this post explains well the case on Robin:

As for the Wailord case: I think that when scums want to jump on a wagon they indeed feel like justifying their vote by echoing, but townies can do that too. Same thing goes when scums try to hop off a dead wagon, only here, it is more common for scum, imo, than town to echo when they unvote. Not sure if that's the main point of your case, but it is not something I feel that is stronger than the points on Robin and Jesi.
This is SM trying to explain the game to someone, and it's finally his thoughts on the current game. It only took 15 posts!! We finally learn that he's leaning towards Robin and Jesi, but not Wailord. And apparently the cases aren't strong enough for him to vote on them, which is odd as I've stated above.

I can think of many reasons as to why a town player would need to know about their neighbors. You just had an example last game with Keeper and the vote weight he got with each QT. In fact, the only reason I think someone would use that as a main point in a case, is a scum trying really wisely to role fish.

FOS on all of the above for role fishing in one way or another.

You are speculating about indies more than a town person should .. Why are you so interested if there is an indie or not? What's make you think Robin is indie and not just scum? How can you tell?

It's like this whole page has a magical thing that makes people talk nothing but their roles..
The question about indies fits into the questioning oneliners. sm really seems to care about what other people are saying.

And now we have sm concerned about role fishing. It's like we get close to thinking what he thinks, but isn't actually willing to say anything. Why so overly cautious?

That point was to show that the fact you went V/LA does not indicate that you are scum, since you did it last game, as well other points that I included that we cannot infer that they are you being yourself or being scum copying your town self.

Then you contradicted yourself. If everyone should share their thoughts, they should not be afraid of getting lynched, as you say- in general. If this game you are doing something against what you as town said in another game, it is scummy. Don't you agree?
When you take away the one liners and barrage of questioning, sm is very narrowly focused on Jesi. I don't think that's inarguable given that it's the only name he's repeatedly mentioned.

So, tl; dr version of the sm case:
- hasn't voted yet; you guys know my philosophy on voting by now and why I find this so problematic
- the lack of a vote is especially peculiar when it comes to how much he's posted today
- a barrage of one liners that are just prods trying to poke info out of people; these are so close to fluff that I struggle to call them participation
- when you take away the one liners, you have solid Jesi tunneling that is especially focused on her play in the last game
- I didn't mention it in the ISO, but his posts reek of Devil's Advocate. This is especially true with the one liners.

Right now I'm conflicted with my vote. I like both cases on Robin and scattered. Robin has been fairly scummy all day and has been very obvious about it. sm hasn't been directly as scummy (in terms of being in your face about it), but I have to award scum points for how he's been hiding it. I'll keep my vote on Robin for now for the sake of getting a lynch in today as I don't know if we have time to entirely jump ship on sm, but I'm entirely willing to do so if the situation arises.
 
Thank for the ISO @Professor Palutena

If it's not looking like a scattered lynch will take then I'm happy to lynch Wailord and
Then if wailord flips scum we will have a strong lead on scattered mind.

I'd prefer a Wailord/scattered lynch over Robin personally.

##unvote scattered mind
##vote Wailord
 
This scattered case also reminds me a lot of one PP made on him in PMJ's last game. Sound familiar?

SM questions all the time, it's literally his play. Hence why I don't think those 1-liners are problematic, he's forming reads. His gradual build up into his leads is characteristic.

This case that PP made feels bad, just like his other scumhunts this day. Not liking it at all, and is why I keep finding him scummy.
 
This scattered case also reminds me a lot of one PP made on him in PMJ's last game. Sound familiar?

SM questions all the time, it's literally his play. Hence why I don't think those 1-liners are problematic, he's forming reads. His gradual build up into his leads is characteristic.

This case that PP made feels bad, just like his other scumhunts this day. Not liking it at all, and is why I keep finding him scummy.

Thank you for pointing this out BB!

For people like me that are not familiar with other's play styles, that post could have swayed others easily because we are comparing player to player again. One of the points were made which sounded almost identical to camoclone. When I brought up Camo earlier, others explained that it was his play style. Had I not known that, I would have voted for Camo. (and Scattered here is really similar, but Scattered seems a bit more susp than Camo).
 
I'd like to see if some of the other experienced players agree with me here. Because PP is also experienced enough to know playstyles.
 
This scattered case also reminds me a lot of one PP made on him in PMJ's last game. Sound familiar?

SM questions all the time, it's literally his play. Hence why I don't think those 1-liners are problematic, he's forming reads. His gradual build up into his leads is characteristic.

This case that PP made feels bad, just like his other scumhunts this day. Not liking it at all, and is why I keep finding him scummy.
It's better than the Wailord case. ;)

Though thank you for your thoughts. Just because sm does it all the time doesn't mean the behaviour is now scummy imo. Heck, Jesi was getting heat earlier today for her constant AtE and how scummy it is. And now we're realizing that meta doesn't mean much, as the Jesi case demonstrates. So you're trying to use meta here to justify what you want to say, and you're only playing the meta card when you're wanting to.

[Future reference] for this buddying and backpedaling
 
It's better than the Wailord case. ;)
Okay...

Though thank you for your thoughts. Just because sm does it all the time doesn't mean the behaviour is now scummy imo. Heck, Jesi was getting heat earlier today for her constant AtE and how scummy it is. And now we're realizing that meta doesn't mean much, as the Jesi case demonstrates. So you're trying to use meta here to justify what you want to say, and you're only playing the meta card when you're wanting to.
How is it scummy? I don't think what scattered is doing is scummy, especially in contrast to other lynch options that would be much better (Robin, Wailord, Jesi, you). Jesi's play is actually scummy and doesn't contribute.

[Future reference]
If you're going to do this, use your own. It messes up my system.

And backpedaling? How?
 
Also, you ignored how I said that this case is similar to that you made in PMJ's game, where you were scum and SM was town. I'd like a response to that.
 
Also, you ignored how I said that this case is similar to that you made in PMJ's game, where you were scum and SM was town. I'd like a response to that.
I don't remember anything about that game so I can't give you any response.

How is it scummy? I don't think what scattered is doing is scummy, especially in contrast to other lynch options that would be much better (Robin, Wailord, Jesi, you). Jesi's play is actually scummy and doesn't contribute.

scattered's play isn't contributing either; you seemed to have missed the main point of the ISO, why is that he isn't contributing to any extent that his activity would suggest, especially when it comes to his vote. It's scummy and I don't like it.

And backpedaling? How?
Backpedaling wasn't quite the word I was looking for.

However, it seems to me like you're willing to use meta as decisive evidence when it'll actually benefit you, such as this case with me. However, you're choosing to ignore it as evidence when it comes to other cases that don't interest you, such as Jesi. I dunno what the actual terminology would be for it, but it seems like you're constantly going back and forth on how importance meta is, which is why I called it backpedaling because you're going backwards on the significance of meta. Not a perfect fit though, I admit.
 
Wasn't your case on him that he unvoted everytime you called him for bandwagoning?
You said you read him as town because of bandwagoning, which may not be common on new scum players, so your point about him unvoting after being called out is nothing? @bbninjas
Ok, although I don't think it is true in TAE's case. It looks to me that he kinda knows what he's doing.
So you mean that you are not going to scumhunt at all ? You just wait for a case, and if there is no case that you like, then you simply do nothing?
Jesi's acting very similar to how she acted in the last game she'd played. However, I expect her to learn from her mistakes (e.g stating that the RVS is over, which is exactly what happened last game she played and she was also called for it), especially after almost every time someone accused her she said she will learn for the next time. So this might be her trying to act like she played last game as town, and use ATE ("I always end up looking scummy").

@PikaMasterJesi - What do you think about the points on Robin?
Why is that? You were very confident he is scummy.
As for the Wailord case: I think that when scums want to jump on a wagon they indeed feel like justifying their vote by echoing, but townies can do that too. Same thing goes when scums try to hop off a dead wagon, only here, it is more common for scum, imo, than town to echo when they unvote. Not sure if that's the main point of your case, but it is not something I feel that is stronger than the points on Robin and Jesi.
I don't understand, which one is it?
Can you explain the contradiction?
Ok, wow Jesi, you said you are going to wait for Wailord to answer, but then you vote after someone else voted? And then you unvote because everyone else unvoted? This is the same scummy behavior you had that almost got me lynched last game. I am saying this in the nicest way : Stop mindlessly bandwagoning. I promise you, it's a lot more fun to play with critical thinking. Or just thinking. The fact that you act the same like when you were town is not going to hold water forever, so stop saying I will learn (noticed how you pull that sentense the first time in this game after I said that is what you used to say last game) and AtE. I am going to read the last game you have played because I am pretty sure you did improve during the game.

@TheSceptileMaster - Are you going to answer my question?
I can think of many reasons as to why a town player would need to know about their neighbors. You just had an example last game with Keeper and the vote weight he got with each QT. In fact, the only reason I think someone would use that as a main point in a case, is a scum trying really wisely to role fish.

FOS on all of the above for role fishing in one way or another.
Why did you unvote Jesi?

Each of these contribute to the scumhunt; even the vague ones contribute more than a lot of the other players. I actually find his questioning most helpful, because he picks up on things I miss and gets information for reads from it. In fact, most of his questioning was done in the first few days of the game, where available information is limited. I'm not sure about his vote; I don't remember how he uses it. But SM does gets reads primarily by questioning.

Seriously... if you're going to lynch SM for "not contributing", you need to lynch the following players first:

Robin
Ice Espeon
SS (though he's improved from the fluff-posting recently)
Reinforce
Wailord (and you say the SM case is much better...)​

And also double o for all of his one-liners.
 
Backpedaling wasn't quite the word I was looking for.

However, it seems to me like you're willing to use meta as decisive evidence when it'll actually benefit you, such as this case with me. However, you're choosing to ignore it as evidence when it comes to other cases that don't interest you, such as Jesi. I dunno what the actual terminology would be for it, but it seems like you're constantly going back and forth on how importance meta is, which is why I called it backpedaling because you're going backwards on the significance of meta. Not a perfect fit though, I admit.

scattered's meta is perfectly fine and helpful.

Jesi's meta is scummy and not as near helpful.

That's the difference.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top