RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Arceus, Darmanitan, and CELEBI!
I love Celebi!! But the border looks..odd.
I love Celebi!! But the border looks..odd.
TCG Fakes Neo Redux: A Triumphant Return? (Image Based) // Gee, you're big.
- Thread starter CMP
- Start date
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Arceus, Darmanitan, and CELEBI!
@VictiniLover -- they aren't real cards, so no, they won't be released.
Thanks, though!
@sableye -- thanks! MissingNo. was a glitch from the original R/B versions. It's type was Bird/Normal...probably a prototype Flying.
@Charganium -- thanks, but I think the border is fine. It was on Victini and nobody said anything haha.
@VictiniLover -- they aren't real cards, so no, they won't be released.
Thanks, though!@sableye -- thanks! MissingNo. was a glitch from the original R/B versions. It's type was Bird/Normal...probably a prototype Flying.
@Charganium -- thanks, but I think the border is fine. It was on Victini and nobody said anything haha.
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Arceus, Darmanitan, and CELEBI!
Well, so it is!
CMP said:@VictiniLover -- they aren't real cards, so no, they won't be released.
@sableye -- thanks! MissingNo. was a glitch from the original R/B versions. It's type was Bird/Normal...probably a prototype Flying.
@Charganium -- thanks, but I think the border is fine. It was on Victini and nobody said anything haha.
Well, so it is!
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Arceus, Darmanitan, and CELEBI!
Summer rush is coming soon. Been busy working on more spoilers, to the point where I have all of the remaining Kanto and Johto 'mons done. Classes have kept me way more busy than I should've been so far this summer, and for that I apologize.
Summer rush is coming soon. Been busy working on more spoilers, to the point where I have all of the remaining Kanto and Johto 'mons done. Classes have kept me way more busy than I should've been so far this summer, and for that I apologize.
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Arceus, Darmanitan, and CELEBI!
Does that mean there's a Mew spoiler?? *anticipates*
CMP said:
Does that mean there's a Mew spoiler?? *anticipates*
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Arceus, Darmanitan, and CELEBI!
YAY!!
CMP said:Sure does, Char. I actually had Mew typed up since about January.
YAY!!
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Arceus, Darmanitan, and CELEBI!
Oh, darn.
CMP said:
Oh, darn.
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Rabbits: Buneary and Lopunny now up!
That Buneary art is awesome.
That Buneary art is awesome.
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Rabbits and Dragonflies -- Buneary, Lopunny, and Vibrava (6/27)
How many more do you need?
How many more do you need?
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Rabbits and Dragonflies -- Buneary, Lopunny, and Vibrava (6/27)
Oh, joy!!
CMP said:
Oh, joy!!
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Ghostly Stirrings -- Yamask and Cofagrigus! (6/28)
On Pupitar's ability, If the ability says it cannot have a status condition, why does it say it doesnt work if one has already been afflicted? Also, on Yamask, isnt its memories text kinda redundant about it not requiring the necessary energy to attack?
Besides that, great cards as always!
On Pupitar's ability, If the ability says it cannot have a status condition, why does it say it doesnt work if one has already been afflicted? Also, on Yamask, isnt its memories text kinda redundant about it not requiring the necessary energy to attack?
Besides that, great cards as always!
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Ghostly Stirrings -- Yamask and Cofagrigus! (6/28)
The "g" in thrashing looks like it got a piece cut off.
The "g" in thrashing looks like it got a piece cut off.
RE: Neo Redux: A full year in the making! UPDATE: Ghostly Stirrings -- Yamask and Cofagrigus! (6/28)
Thanks for the comment, BlueEmboar'n'Bisharp! These same wording questions come up each time is post a card with a similar power or attack. The wording, while odd, is official.
Pupitar's power comes straight from Jungle Snorlax. I'm assuming the "This power can't be used if..." is added in case a power that shuts down other powers is used?
The text on Yamask is redundant, yes, but I'm of the opinion it's there for extra clarification. For that wording, I used Neo Genesis Togetic.
BlueEmboar said:On Pupitar's ability, If the ability says it cannot have a status condition, why does it say it doesnt work if one has already been afflicted? Also, on Yamask, isnt its memories text kinda redundant about it not requiring the necessary energy to attack?
Besides that, great cards as always!
Thanks for the comment, BlueEmboar'n'Bisharp! These same wording questions come up each time is post a card with a similar power or attack. The wording, while odd, is official.
Pupitar's power comes straight from Jungle Snorlax. I'm assuming the "This power can't be used if..." is added in case a power that shuts down other powers is used?
The text on Yamask is redundant, yes, but I'm of the opinion it's there for extra clarification. For that wording, I used Neo Genesis Togetic.