Pokemon is a money stealing scheme. Have no cash? Playing pokemon? Connection!!!

Do you agree with this article?


  • Total voters
    97
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow, worst biased argument ever.

And has anyone noticed he hasn't replied yet?

Rikko, are you full yet? I heard trolls eat a lot,
but with everyone here feeding you, you've surely got to be full by now.
Edit: Whoops, I just added to your plate...darn.
 
I thought this thread was a bit stupid and amusing already, but then I read the Psyduck story... Now I am furious and I officially hate Rikko....
 
^there isnt to much of a topic. its just someone ranting on how nintendo makes cards and thus makes money. not to much to discuss. sure most of the packs youg et are crap but some are good and pay for thems selves many times over. ever got a gengar prime out of a 4 dollar pack well you just made 40 dollars if you decide to sell. really any prime that you get but 1 out of 10 packs will have a prime (at least for me....i suck at pulling good cards). sure people ranting wont change anything but its just fun to read...and make fun of...

ninja'd....and rofl at meaty.
 
Meaty, the fact you have a dancing Psyduck in your avatar just made me laugh so much harder at the "Psyduck Spit Incident". This thread should probably be closed now...after reading a large wall of text on the first page and a bunch of smaller posts, all of which are true, I think we talked over everything now. Rikko145, son, I am dissapoint. I thought you were more intelligent than this.
 
If you really like something, it should be ok to spend money on it. Sure 4k is too much, but $100-200 is mine (with PRs, Boxes, etc.). Lets say you like tennis, would you spend $25 to get into a tennis touney? Of course!
 
If your talking about the rarity of the materials used for the cards, then sure, pokemon cards are pretty much worthless. But as I recall we buy the cards mainly for the game and collections. It is for appreciation of the card and the game.

Also if it is something you enjoy,then money really shouldnt be a limitation to your enjoyment. Why pay $20 for a DVD, all it is is a disc worth like a dime but we enjoy watching it. Your clothes cost like 5% of what you paid for them but as long as you enjoy wearing them, then it doesnt matter

Youe arguement is comepletely flawed and you can play the game with good investments. I bought my lux xs for about $20 each. Now I can sell them for $50 each if I wanted...
 
I have a couple kids at my league who just love playing the game.
They uses little more that theme decks and while they may not be to competitive in a tournament sense they have a minimal investment and have fun with them. $13.49 and Wal-Mart is all it takes.

It is our demand that drives the prices higher for popular cards.

Rip off or money make scheme? No.
 
No duh they want our money. Thats the whole point of the company in the first place. Carpooling and sharing hotle rooms cuts down on the cost considerably. Trading is a better way to get cards rather than buying them
 
PikachewTofu said:
Meaty, the fact you have a dancing Psyduck in your avatar just made me laugh so much harder at the "Psyduck Spit Incident".
Agreed. Check out Shakespeare's avvy... even more hilarious.
 
This was said before, but I will say say it again. STAY ON TOPIC!! The point of this thread was to explain how Pokemon is a costly game, etc... NOT ABOUT AVATARS! kthanxbai
 
.::n00bmuffin::. said:
Pokemon isn't an investment. It's fun.

Be nice If other TCG/CCG's like Magic and Yu-Gi-Oh! were the same way,
with Yu-Gi-Oh! it's basically setup to pay for itself while not being affordable at the same time and Magic seems to be going the same direction Yu-Gi-Oh! is. Those TCG/CCG's could learn a thing or two about being affordable especially in this down economy.

I will admit that Magic is affordable on a Casual level unless you're playing EDH/Commander. Yu-Gi-Oh! on the other hand, be nice If the cards didn't cost so much but it's great that the reprints helped ease the cost of getting into it despite hurting the card's value in terms of rarity with reprints just by changing them from a high to a low rarity.

Cards should be reprinted with the same rarity it previously had so it doesn't lose value.
 
Um. We turn the good cards to 90$. Not Pokémon. Collectors. Which means we're making money.

And does it even matter? It doesn't cost more than any other hobby. Skiing in NM is like at least 5,000 a year and you don't make anything back.

And your argument about animals and the apocalypse or whatever is irrelevant and invalid, it's like one of those "What two things would you bring to a deserted island" question.

Furthermore, I only spend about 100 on Pokémon a year.

And way to bash the mods.

I kinda really really hate you.

It's a shame GHJameGH's post got deleted, it was a pretty good summary.

Now GTFO my forums, you whiny, closed minded, pseudo intellectual.
 
crm103top08 said:
Rikko, are you full yet? I heard trolls eat a lot
Guys, he's on to something. If I were you I'd look at this and think twice about posting in here.
 
Just take your complaining elseware. Heytrainer has a section for complaining about life. Pokegym might accept you. Evil Psyduck just loves you... But this and the darkrai thread were 2 of my favorites ever

Keeping on topic, name one hobby that you spend no money on. This article applies to life in general

Edit again
Pokemon is actually very cheap.
Once you have a collection you never really have to buy anything for it again. Sure something here and there, but you shouldn't need to spend major money. One of the ways to make Pokemon expensive is Rh your deck out (and then get banned for said psyduck incident the tournament you finish it
 
^ it can be. sure you may be able to run luxchomp for 2 years buuut then you lose it and have to spend 100+ to get the next top deck in the meta. it can be expensive if you make it...and if your a collector well...your set because you just have to buy some rare cards that are very collectable and you wont be using them because your a collector (although some people are collectors and players but hey if your a collector your not going to be using your mega ultra rare cards that are worth 100+ dollars). and its pretty hard to stay on topic...when well you know lol
 
So, this sounds like the author just discovered the main mechanics of capitalism.
So, this isn't very surprising, but it's also exactly the same with all the other TCGs and probably the whole toy industry and beyond... It is also the same with branded clothes, etc.
Face the fact: we're just humans. Creepy, profite focused humans. So why not sell the idea of Pocket Monsters and reap millions of dollars out of interested subjects. I guess, if anyone in the crowd here's got an idea that can be selled very profitable, this person wouldn't care about the circumstances of the production or the of the buying people as long as it is worthwhile.


But, if you are thinking about all the money spent, you must accept that is a really capitalistic view, right. It is just money, nothing less. If you have the money to buy new additions in form of booster packs and boxes to your collection, where is the matter?
This gets problematic when the collecting results in addiction and taking money you don't got. So, simple keep Pocket Monsters as a hobby.

Renoir over.
 
Just like to point out something. So Pokemon cards are nothing more than fanicly drawn and in some cases holographically done pieces of cardboard that we as players/collectors and sellers assign value too. Well, so is money. Money is nothing more than a representation (to use a grocery store term here, paper or plastic?... plus digital if you wanna be technical these days) that society and our government has assigned 'value' too. Take this form of currency to the reniassance period and it's colored paper and weird small rectangles to them.

Anyone here collect other CCGS? I know one person has said they play Yugioh here, I have dabbled in it as well enough to know how it costs way more than Pokemon. In my time I have played/collected First Edtion Star Trek CCG from Decipher (dead game) Sailor Moon CCG from I think Dartz (have the full sets, is also a dead game) and Buffy CCG from Score (have the full sets, also a dead game) but the money put into it (and technically lost) doesn't matter when I can recall the time I spent playing these games with friends and any other cool memories, like finding an ultra rare holographic in my first Buffy starter deck. By the way, any ultra rare in Buffy is worth way more than any Pokemon card (at least by Ebay standards) and as mention earlier that is considered a dead game.

How about video games? WOW (World of Warcraft) is a big waste of time and money to me, but hey that's my opinion and millions of others disagree. Grand Theft Auto games anyone? Won't be me, see my above statement. How about Final Fantasy? Okay, that I'll buy into but I know others don't. How about Dead Space? Again, I'll buy into that but not everyone will. What matters is that it's worth it to the people who play them.

Any hobby is costly, especially added up. I know someone who spends almost as much money on astronomy as I do on Pokemon (particularly in the long run) and they go out stargazing maybe once a week weather permitting. Does it seem wasteful, yes. If it's worth it to him then that is all that counts.

Can't really blame advertising either. First off, these days half the peole skip the commercials or just ignore them. We've seen plenty of commercials for Warcraft (the one with Mr. T and his mohawk gernade spring to mind) and I couldn't care less. I even ignored the Dead Space 2 commercial because I already had my mind made up and my copy reserved before the commercial aired (fyi, I have Black and White fully reserved and I hadn't even seen a commercial for it). Advertising is a way to show off products and try to encourage viewers to buy them but when it comes down to it that power is still with the viewers.

How about something more harmful than mere entertainment. Anyone smokers, because that's just even more costly than Pokemon (my parents being life long smokers at least in so far as my memory goes) and way more harmful than Pokemon. These days for two cartons of cigarettes that cause lung cancer and stuff that is usually the equivalent of an unopened box of cards that is far less harmful. Drugs? More costly and more harmful. Alcholol? More costly and more harmful. Gambling? More costly and if taken too far more harmful.

Say one gives up Pokemon (or anything else, insert Yugioh, video games, what have you if you'd like) and you have that 'extra' money. What do you do with it? Me I got nothing else I could really name to do with it. As long as one is able to meet ones other financial responsibilties (ie insurance, rent, cost of living, etc.) then does it really matter?

Bottom line, to both the OP and anyone else, if you don't think the cost to enjoyment factor is worth whatever you are/were doing then give it up, that is your call. To the rest of us who will continue to collect/play/trade or whatever in any respective hobbies, then keep reaching for the stars.

Oh and OP, your poll should have had a fourth option in it: Yes I know all of this and I don't care.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top