RE: The Two Legendary Pokemon
WPM, Xerneas' feet are on the ground, I don't understand what you're talking about.
WPM, Xerneas' feet are on the ground, I don't understand what you're talking about.
beta4attack said:I think it's from the Norse mythology as some stated. Yggdrasil is pronounced the same as Yveltal, I think.
Eos_Hyperion said:Xerneas, French for deer is Cerf
FloodBadge said:Eos_Hyperion said:Xerneas, French for deer is Cerf
Xerneas and Cerf
maybe it was made with Cerf and stuff, but just had the C replaced with X?
I guess that's true.FloodBadge said:beta4attack said:I think it's from the Norse mythology as some stated. Yggdrasil is pronounced the same as Yveltal, I think.
Yveltal isn't the one based off of Yggdrasil. and the only thing that's the same with pronunciation with the names is the Y that comes out like EE
and i just realized that this generation WILL have a pokemon #666 which will end up causing some controversy like alakazam being a satanic symbol, and golbat being a nazi white supremacist (shape of the head and design, and an old card respectively)
beta4attack said:I guess that's true.FloodBadge said:Yveltal isn't the one based off of Yggdrasil. and the only thing that's the same with pronunciation with the names is the Y that comes out like EE
and i just realized that this generation WILL have a pokemon #666 which will end up causing some controversy like alakazam being a satanic symbol, and golbat being a nazi white supremacist (shape of the head and design, and an old card respectively)
And wait, why would the number 666 cause a controversy? And I never knew Alakazam was called so... O_O Why was Alakazam called that? Oh wait, read it again. Sorry that I didn't read the rest properly.
Look at how the Pokedex is structured:Eos_Hyperion said:I think that they will skip the number 666 to prevent controversies
Paddy185 said:Look at how the Pokedex is structured:Eos_Hyperion said:I think that they will skip the number 666 to prevent controversies
We're on Pokemon 649 now:
9 for the starters brings us to 658.
3 for the bird line and 2 for the rodent brings us to 663.
Usually, after those lines, there are smaller cutesy Pokemon found earlygame.
Pokemon no.666 will most likely be a small earlygame thing. If they used the number and it was a small Pokemon, then I doubt many people will make a fuss over it. However, if they skipped it, people would be confused as to why it went from 665 to 667, and they'd realise that it was delibarately skipped. If they put a Pokemon in that space, I highly doubt it will a Dark/Ghost/Anything that could be offensive.
tl;dr Pokemon no.666 will most likely be a small Pokemon, and not one that is likely to cause controversies.
Paddy185 said:Look at how the Pokedex is structured:Eos_Hyperion said:I think that they will skip the number 666 to prevent controversies
We're on Pokemon 649 now:
9 for the starters brings us to 658.
3 for the bird line and 2 for the rodent brings us to 663.
Usually, after those lines, there are smaller cutesy Pokemon found earlygame.
Pokemon no.666 will most likely be a small earlygame thing. If they used the number and it was a small Pokemon, then I doubt many people will make a fuss over it. However, if they skipped it, people would be confused as to why it went from 665 to 667, and they'd realise that it was delibarately skipped. If they put a Pokemon in that space, I highly doubt it will a Dark/Ghost/Anything that could be offensive.
tl;dr Pokemon no.666 will most likely be a small Pokemon, and not one that is likely to cause controversies.
Mitja said:lolwhat, why would gamefreak give a damn about some people being superstitious about a....number?
665, 666, 667... ooooo that was scary /not