RE: Yugioh Thread
I already thought of dumb combos.
Use Tefnuit and Su to get into Atum. Atum's effect to get out a Galaxy-Eyes. If you have a Galaxy-Eyes in the graveyard, normal summon Galaxy Knight to revive the Galaxy-Eyes to get into Neo Galaxy-Eyes. Alternatively, you could normal summon Photon Satellite and Xyz into Number 9.
I already thought of dumb combos.
Use Tefnuit and Su to get into Atum. Atum's effect to get out a Galaxy-Eyes. If you have a Galaxy-Eyes in the graveyard, normal summon Galaxy Knight to revive the Galaxy-Eyes to get into Neo Galaxy-Eyes. Alternatively, you could normal summon Photon Satellite and Xyz into Number 9.
J
Juliacoolo
RE: Yugioh Thread
To what degree, if at all, do you guys think Galaxy Knight will be limited?
To what degree, if at all, do you guys think Galaxy Knight will be limited?
RE: Yugioh Thread
If Galaxy Knight makes any impact on the metagame, it will be semi limited at most due to the fact that nothing except draw power can add it from your deck to your hand. The main reason why cards are put on the list is because they're flat-out overpowered and/or they're very easy to get, and Galaxy Knight doesn't fit the latter. Not saying it fits the former either, but still. It's a very easy way to get into a rank 8, and makes getting into Neo Galaxy-Eyes Photon Dragon in a Hieratic deck extremely easy.
If Galaxy Knight makes any impact on the metagame, it will be semi limited at most due to the fact that nothing except draw power can add it from your deck to your hand. The main reason why cards are put on the list is because they're flat-out overpowered and/or they're very easy to get, and Galaxy Knight doesn't fit the latter. Not saying it fits the former either, but still. It's a very easy way to get into a rank 8, and makes getting into Neo Galaxy-Eyes Photon Dragon in a Hieratic deck extremely easy.
RE: Yugioh Thread
Well, if you're making Fiends, I'd start by maxing our your Tour Guides.
Or is this an IRL deck?
Well, if you're making Fiends, I'd start by maxing our your Tour Guides.
Or is this an IRL deck?
RE: Yugioh Thread
Well, if you can get your hands on a 3rd Tour Guide, I'd definitely recommend adding it. I'm not too familiar with Fiend decks...
EDIT: Remember Madolches? That fun deck that you saw every so often?
Yeah, I remember them.
Yeah...about Madolches.
They aren't fun anymore.
Well, at least not for the opponent.
Well, if you can get your hands on a 3rd Tour Guide, I'd definitely recommend adding it. I'm not too familiar with Fiend decks...
EDIT: Remember Madolches? That fun deck that you saw every so often?
Yeah, I remember them.
Yeah...about Madolches.
They aren't fun anymore.
Well, at least not for the opponent.
RE: Yugioh Thread
I've got an idea for a tournament!
Each participant in the tournament states an archetype after the bracket has been put together. When everybody has entered, these archetypes are shuffled and randomly distributed to each player. Their deck for the tournament must focus around that archetype. I think it'd give players a lot more insight for the game by allowing them to try playing and facing decks that they haven't seen very much, if at all...and if anybody happens to state a metagame archetype like Inzektors, they could risk getting Harpies against Inzektors or something dumb like that.
What do you guys think of this?
I've got an idea for a tournament!
Each participant in the tournament states an archetype after the bracket has been put together. When everybody has entered, these archetypes are shuffled and randomly distributed to each player. Their deck for the tournament must focus around that archetype. I think it'd give players a lot more insight for the game by allowing them to try playing and facing decks that they haven't seen very much, if at all...and if anybody happens to state a metagame archetype like Inzektors, they could risk getting Harpies against Inzektors or something dumb like that.
What do you guys think of this?
RE: Yugioh Thread
As long as the deck clearly focuses on the first archetype. Like, you can run a few Lavals in a Flamvell deck to assist in dumping monsters, for example, but the deck should focus on Flamvells.
Basically every Psychic-type monster has support for Psychics, but I don't think they'd be considered an archetype...
As long as the deck clearly focuses on the first archetype. Like, you can run a few Lavals in a Flamvell deck to assist in dumping monsters, for example, but the deck should focus on Flamvells.
Basically every Psychic-type monster has support for Psychics, but I don't think they'd be considered an archetype...
RE: Yugioh Thread
I wouldn't consider it an archetype. Some of them share words in their name, yes, but their support specifically is for Psychic-type monsters, not Psychics with a certain word in their name.
I wouldn't consider it an archetype. Some of them share words in their name, yes, but their support specifically is for Psychic-type monsters, not Psychics with a certain word in their name.
J
Juliacoolo
RE: Yugioh Thread
I think it would be too hard to enforce, and where to cut the line.
I think it would be too hard to enforce, and where to cut the line.
RE: Yugioh Thread
We could make it so at least 60% of the monster cards in your deck have to consist of monsters from your archetype or something.
We could make it so at least 60% of the monster cards in your deck have to consist of monsters from your archetype or something.