Good catch... I can't believe I missed that.sillykyle said:Yeah, I'm calling BS on that claim. Why? Simple. You claim to have quoted the entire ability, but if you are told who targeted you, it would say so in the ability. I don't know if you're a serial killer or not, but regardless, you're lying.
POKE: Keeper of Night
Camoclone said:@PMJ hypothetically if a roleblocker blocked a self watcher then would the self watcher get the results?
Read it again and let your mistake slowly sink in.Keeper of Night said:I don't understand what sillykyle means, but I see the confusion at least. I really wish you wouldn't make me quote the entire effect. I'm trying to help town here.
I know what you mean (it says alerted vs giving me the name), but it's no mistake. However, I never said once that it was the entire effect.Camoclone said:Read it again and let your mistake slowly sink in.Keeper of Night said:I don't understand what sillykyle means, but I see the confusion at least. I really wish you wouldn't make me quote the entire effect. I'm trying to help town here.
Alerted and giving you the name is very different. So what is the entire effect?Keeper of Night said:I know what you mean (it says alerted vs giving me the name), but it's no mistake. However, I never said once that it was the entire effect.Camoclone said:Read it again and let your mistake slowly sink in.
What do you have to hide?Keeper of Night said:@Camo, I've only claimed my role name and a passive effect. That does not mean I wish to make my entire role public.
You want the role blocker to claim? Scum.TheGuy said:I'm just not believing Keeper's story. It seems both made up and weak.
##SerialKiller: Keeper of Night
The only thing that could change my mind is if someone claims role blocker and they role blocked Keeper.
Well that's extremely suspicious.Keeper of Night said:I know what you mean (it says alerted vs giving me the name), but it's no mistake. However, I never said once that it was the entire effect.Camoclone said:Read it again and let your mistake slowly sink in.
Keeper of Night said:What about it seems made up to you? I've only told the truth.
Now, here's where we see differently. I know two people were on me last night, chances are one was a role-blocker. I could, in theory, point fingers at them to try and prove my story. But, whether they helped me or not, chances are at least one of them would die tonight. This is why I asked them not to claim, and will not be asking anything of the sort, even if it would help me.
I would think, if you were town, you would also want the role-blockers to remain hidden until they actually blocked a wolf or the SK.
Teal said:You want the role blocker to claim? Scum.
##UNVOTE: Jeremy1026
##VOTE: TheGuy
You didn't ask directly, but that statement could very well push a newb player to claim role blocker so it's a way dangerous thing to say for a townie. It seems like you were hoping for someone to claim.TheGuy said:I said that a role blocker claiming would convince me that Keeper is innocent however I did not ask for a role blocker to claim and would ask said hypothetical role blocker to not claim.Teal said:You want the role blocker to claim? Scum.
##UNVOTE: Jeremy1026
##VOTE: TheGuy
Keeper of Night said:Camoclone said:I missed this earlier... Fair enough. Could you quote your whole passive effect though?
Yeah, that I could do:
So for all I know, there could have been more than two players on me last night, as that would definitely increase the chances of me knowing two of them.Passive Effect: HINTZ
You may be alerted when other players target you at night.
Hinting at another ability doesn't work for me... However I believe there is a chance that you are telling the truth. I doubt that you would make the role from scratch and that rather if this role is not your role then it is your safe claim. I'll believe you but I think we need to get rid of you before LYLO and MYLO. You create WIFOM< unless someone else flips SK. Let's get down to business.Keeper of Night said:And to think, none of this would have happened if Drohn wasn't trying to drag me down with him.
Saying "I never said it was the entire effect" was just in response to sillykyle, which is true. I never said it myself. However, I'm not lying now when I say that is my entire passive effect. Guy, I c/p'd the wording, I'm sorry if it doesn't seem legit to you, but that's no reason for the role blocker to claim. At least, not yet.
Sillykyle, I didn't lie. That is my passive effect. My ENTIRE passive effect. The PM I received was titled "HINTZ" and contained two usernames inside (as well as flavor, but that's not relevant IMO). The only way I could prove this would be naming them, but as Teal said, that would be a bad idea. I rather you lynch me and lose one town than save me by revealing them and losing two town PRs (potentially).
TheGuy said:I'm just not believing Keeper's story. It seems both made up and weak.
##SerialKiller: Keeper of Night
The only thing that could change my mind is if someone claims role blocker and they role blocked Keeper.