RE: Werewolf XXVI: Harmonic Divergence | Day 1 Ends on the 22nd at 22:00 BST
Ugh it's 4 in the morning and I just got done reading this. Now I have to reply. @_@
Keeper of Night said:
Assuming you're a wolf, I think your train of thought earlier was something along the lines of "I'm gonna say people should ignore Camo to convince people I'm contributing. Oh now I'm being accused for it, now I have to think of reasons to justify my post, because I don't actually have a main reason for not wanting Camo to post."
Ha. Actually, I could see that, but it's still funny.
I have justified my points since I first posted, though, so I have had no need to "think of reasons to justify my post."
If you're a wolf, then yes, you do have to think of reasons to justify your posts. Note to all WW players: not everything people say about you is something for you to dispute.
Keeper of Night said:
And another thing: When you initially told everyone to ignore Camo, you didn't say anything else in your post. And your only post before that was a joke post. If this pressure on you didn't start, what were you planning to do the rest of the day? How were you planning to get a wolf lynched today/get us closer to lynching one tomorrow? All your posts have been are defenses against yourself and your argument, except for one or two minor things in your last post.
I planned to do what I do every WW game. Post when I feel necessary and pressure for explanations when none are given. As I will continue to do until I die or this game has ended.
Okay, then don't say someone's doing a bad job of leading people out of RVS if you're not really doing that.
Keeper of Night said:
This is the thing that annoys me the most: when people say Camo is bad for the town and then do nothing to move discussion forward. If Camo's "so bad for the town" you've gotta prove it by finding a better method. (This also happens to be something I see wolves do a lot, JSYK.)
I use a method that has no other answer than providing us with information. The players I questioned must answer or seem scummy for not doing so. They are also required to give us well-thought-out answers, which can provide us with more information on any given person than simply telling somebody they are scum and expecting them to react.
The problem with your plan is that at this point in the game, there wouldn't be anything to question without someone doing something similar to what Camo does. If nothing ever gets going in the game, people can't make posts that can be questioned.
Keeper of Night said:
Tell me, which method (or another, please share) do you honestly expect to get more information from? RVS, or legitimate, specific questioning?
I think what I said above answers this question. Both are needed, but at different points in the game.
Celever said:
~6 users have contributed to discussion since you started your big spam tradition: myself, KoN, bb, Bigfoot, MtC and yourself.
Bigfoot? At the time you posted this, the only thing Bigfoot did was make vote without giving reasoning.
Camoclone said:
Keeper of Night said:
That is the most anti-town thing you've said yet.
No questions are bad questions. They address concerns that you should have no problem responding to. Why hide?
We both know that voting you wouldn't do me any good. Not at this point.
Ok then why should I answer your questions if I don't feel threatened? If I'm not close to being lynched then I can continue to ignore your questions while pursuing your lynch.
I have provided much more reasoning than that. And now I am further inclined to believe that you do not wish for any discussion but that concerning my lynch.
You claim to want discussion, yet refuse to answer any question directed at you. Why?
Because I'd rather have the discussion be about how you are scum. No reason for me to defend myself if I'm not going to be lynched.
I actually disagree with you. You really should be answering these questions. Unless the person asking them is confirmed scum, your answers to them will matter somewhere down the road. And if your response is going to be "well KoN's confirmed scum, so his questions don't matter" then you're wrong because he's not confirmed. No one is confirmed anything.
bbninjas said:
Celever said:
bb, because KoN is in the right and I explained why I voted for Camo in the post which I voted in.
Look, Camo, this is how you answer a question. I'd advise you try to learn the skill.
[X] FAILED [ ] NOT FAILED
You failed.
I laughed really hard at this for some reason.
BigfootAUS said:
Oh boy, it's a good thing there's not a faction in this game that focuses on removing your bending powers. Or maybe the evil factions will just let you talk freely from the grave so you can cause more distractions during town discussions. Heck, having a Day 1-level of productivity throughout the whole game would be great for the bad guys.
I believe your role, but I think you shouldn't have revealed it.
##UNVOTE: Celever
I'm going to uni for the day, I'll check back later.
I know it says in the OP that the Equalists remove Bending powers, but didn't it seem like Bigfoot had a bit too much confidence in that statement? With all the Camo, Keeper and Celever nonsense going around, did anyone remember anything about the flavor of the game? I sure didn't until Bigfoot brought it up. Maybe Bigfoot was reminded of the Equalists in some way? Maybe because he... IS ONE?!?! Also there was a lot of snark to it. Like "you townies are stupid, we just got a free kill on Celever." Well that's a bit harsh, but you get the idea.
After seeing Celever's role reveal, I'm inclined to believe he's town. I mean, he could be scum trying to pull some WIFOM on us, while
also pretending to not remember about the Equalist's power, but that just seems highly unlikely.
Camo I'm pretty even on. I don't really have any evidence to suggest what his alignment is. Him avoiding Keeper's questions is pretty scummy, but that's pretty typical for Camo.
I'm still gonna keep my vote on Keeper (pun intended) for now. A lot of his reasoning seems like he's making it up on the spot, and it doesn't sound genuine. And for those who are saying we shouldn't lynch Keeper because he's one of the top contributors today, I believe he is only one of the top contributors because he's under so much pressure. People post a lot more when they're the subject of today's lynch, for obvious reasons. If we let him live he'll become partially active, and someone of that activity level is alright to lynch, in my opinion.