RE: Werewolf XXVI: Harmonic Divergence | Day 1 Ends on the 22nd at 22:00 BST
##UNVOTE: Camoclone
##VOTE: grantm1999
Call it OMGUS if you want, but this is a legit case, and I'm surprised no one else noticed it. I would have done this if grant had voted for anyone, because he's made this too easy.
grant is an Equalist, and I'm about to show you why:
grantm1999 said:
Come at me bro
Celever is a good lynch. I'm inclined to think his claim may be a bluff.
Tell me why.
Aside from the scummy stuff he was going to get lynched for anyway,
Such as?
I think his vigorous (probably not the word I'm looking for) defending of the town (or Red Lotus, for all Celever, knows) KoN was a sneaky scum play.
Ha, you slipped. The town or Red Lotus? Why is he not also a possible Equalist? OH I KNOW! You clearly thought in your head "KoN must be one of the other two factions because he's not aligned with me" and accidentally let it slip in your post.
When it looked like KoN was going to be lynched, Celever started defending him so that he would get lots of town cred when KoN flipped town. Of course, Celever would know that KoN was town (possible RL) because he was scum himself. I believe this is what Celever did.
This is plausible, yes, although I DID buddy with KoN long before it looked like I was getting lynched, which makes this statement hold less weight. In fact, I buddied KoN since basically the very start of the day, when he first attacked Camo. Serious votes were put on me way after this.
Then, everyone suddenly turned on Celever, and he claims this bogus ghost thing or whatever. He even voted himself to be extra convincing!
Sarcasm doesn't help anyone, as was pointed out to me earlier. I claimed a ghost thing, which in reality set me up to be lynched (and yes, I voted for myself because I thought it was the right thing to do). I'd have to be a REALLY bad scum to claim something which benefits from being lynched. Of course, then whoever it was pointed out that I could have my bending removed, and the plan suddenly looked a lot less appetising! x____x
In his haste, Celever forgot (or disregarded) the basic rule/strat that you never never never ever vote yourself as town.
There is no such thing.
Additionally, Celever said the thing about the bbcode. Of course he wouldn't post the bbcode! Then he would be instantly outed! his cover was really weak as well.
Celever- you can easily disprove this by posting the bbcode, sorta.
Of course you would want the bbcode. I alerted your faction to the fact that there is bbcode, and now you're trying to get that info out of me. I'm not posting it, and your slip earlier on in your post is the main reason why. I'm gonna need a good excuse for that, especially because the Red Lotus wasn't an active topic at all in the game. The Equalists were a hot topic point when I claimed earlier, so even if you'd just read the thread in one go (which you must have done because as you claimed earlier in your post (I cut it out though, whoops x_x) you were busy before now) it would have been on your mind way more than the RL.
Even if Celever's town and his claim is true, Celever is SUPER DUPER helpful as confirmed town as far as his posting.
Thanks! I disagree, but hey
. Anyway, since you have this viewpoint, it only makes sense that you'd want me dead as an anti-town.
I think Celever as confirmed town and without a vote is more helpful than he is now. Not only is Celever one of the more active players, he's also one of the most experienced.
This is one of those times where flattery having no effect on me is a good thing, right?
It would be valuable to have him posting when we can trust every word he says. of course he could still be wrong about some things, but a confo-townie that cannot die is really good to have.
Which is why you want me lynched, to get rid of my bending and to kill me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think I've made my point clear enough. His slip of not mentioning the Equalists is enough for a decent Day 1 case in itself, but the rest of his post only ties in with the theory so well. His half-baked case against me "the reasons he had votes before etc." is clearly just a way to try and push a lynch by playing on the existing suspicions of the town, but since there's actually no case against me (at least a public one someone's posted) he couldn't give any examples. He just knows that it's best to get me out of the picture ASAP, because like he said, a confotown is a powerful thing.
His whole post is also typed up like he knows something more. Is that just me? It's like he's hiding something somewhere, and I really don't know why. His question to IE about whether dead players can be targeted also shows that he's trying to limit the options for the situation. I've already talked about how I'm not a regular dead and he knows this, he's just hoping that no one else notices as well.
PMJ also posted this while I was typing this up, which I just find amusing:
PMJ said:
Failing a huge, catastrophic scum slip, today's lynch probably won't be built on any sort of solid logical ground.
I think I found one! Maybe not a "huge, catastrophic" slip, but it's good enough.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't really have anything to say with the rest of the discussion since I've gone. If anyone has anything they would like me to respond to, please do so.
As for the bbcode, I'll post it tomorrow if we end up lynching grant and he flips town. If not, just be thankful I didn't
. The "Quote:" text should be sufficient IMO anyway, since even though scum roles also probably have it, it'd be a hell of a thing to remember to include in a fake, especially in a bbcodeless one. If you were on the scum team, or possibly the mason group, in Wizarding Wars, you'll know that I'm not this good at remembering things. Hell, I missed out the masonry paragraph in my fake claim when I first posted it in the mason chat back then! >~>
READ: I know this post looks kinda long, but I promise it isn't. It's tall, but most are oneliner responses to one line parts of grant's post. Sorry about that, there was just a lot wrong with it >_>