Finished Werewolf XXVIII: Omega Alpha - Game Finished - Postgame Up!

Status
Not open for further replies.
So suspicion about Celever was correct, then.

I'm kind of curious about one thing. As far as I'm aware, vote weights isn't an incredibly common mechanic. Yet GM DracLord was focusing on it quite a lot earlier, and now it turns out there's quite a bit of it going on (SilverSilent's ability, the Grimers and tgk suddenly having double vote weight). So what's the deal here?

Never stop focussing about it FYI. Just not posting here alot about it anymore. The focus part most probably cause thats is the only think I more sure of then other things
 
But you still denied that it was scumtell, rather than saying that sometimes it's okay.

It's not.

That's a scumtell.

Yes it does. Like really, it does. There's nothing more for me to say here because you haven't actually provided a proper rebuttal ???

No it doesn't, like really, it doesn't. There's nothing for me to rebut because you are completely wrong here.

That's a scumtell.
As evidenced by two other users saying you're in their top 2 scum reads this is clearly a lie.

Nice to see you put so much stock into d1 banter

That's a scumtell.My argument can't hold less weight because you set yourself up to be able to place a vote on a lynch contender when the point in the case is about you placing a vote on a lynch contender. That just shows it was a plan as opposed to impulse, which is actually even scummier, since everyone makes mistakes upon impulse -- planned mistakes basically don't exist.

Look I know I said to give me some credit but that's some tinfoil conspiracy there. You are focusing way too hard on Luis being scum.

That's a scumtell.
It's treated as a scumtell everywhere though.

I only play here so w/e

That's a scumtell.
LOL LOOK AT THIS DUMBTELL.

If anyone else had asked that question you would not have said this. It's a legit question because not all hosts do things the same way, and if no majority = no lynch then scum has a vested interest in stalling the day out for as long as possible, and not just going for it once a good lead is found. Hammering has both pro- and anti-town points.
 
It's not.
You're the only one arguing this side of the argument, which probably means it is a scumtell. Regardless it is perceived as a scumtell so it makes no sense for you to try and argue this point of view in this game.
No it doesn't, like really, it doesn't. There's nothing for me to rebut because you are completely wrong here.
If I'm so completely wrong it should be easy for you to say why then!
Nice to see you put so much stock into d1 banter
It was on Day 2. Literally the same page as the post of mine you just quoted.
Look I know I said to give me some credit but that's some tinfoil conspiracy there. You are focusing way too hard on Luis being scum.
No it's not, it was just pointing out why what you did was scummy because you said it wasn't. It pulled your argument apart.
I only play here so w/e
That's not really releveant? It is a scumtell everywhere including here, so whether you play elsewhere or you just play here makes no difference. I was just pointing out to other users that it's not something exclusive to this site since that's what your posts were implying, intentionally or not.
If anyone else had asked that question you would not have said this. It's a legit question because not all hosts do things the same way, and if no majority = no lynch then scum has a vested interest in stalling the day out for as long as possible, and not just going for it once a good lead is found. Hammering has both pro- and anti-town points.
Not at all. I pointed out Luis' dumbtell and I pointed yours out too. If I see a dumbtell I will point it out, because dumbtells are scummy 100% of the time.

It also wasn't a legitimate question at all, because the norm here is plurality (the player with the most votes gets lynched at the end of the day). It's so rare that if a game uses the mechanic where a player has to be hammered to be lynched it's marketed all over the OP and is referenced in a couple posts to make sure the players understand it, much like you did with the timer mechanic last game. You have a lot of experience here and you know this, thus it was a dumbtell.
 
If others find this argument as worthless we can stop it, but really I think that PMJ is the only lynch with anything like support behind it today so I think it's worth pursuing right now.
 
The argument is definitely useless or this lead is definitely worth pursuing?
I think both. As I thought would happen, PMJ is still only defending himself and paying no attention to other cases at hand. With the only lead we have besides the inactives, I say we should go for it.

##VOTE: PMJ
 
PMJ actually did give a case on simisand. However, giving a case on the one no one is going to vote for without making sure it is final duo to the vote lock is kind of suspicious for me. Trying to catch someone unaware and lock him in voting for simisand and thus making it harder to lynch him?

SilverSilent is still a good option next day I guess. TT still not here. GM Drac is posting but.. not actually putting his thoughts on who is scum. Keeper I suppose just keeping up with the thread and like last game would probably catch up and start contribute, I hope. That's for now from what I can think about.
I would vote PMJ but there are 2 things that currently are stoping me from doing so:

- There is a lot of votes on him with the Grimers and it's still early and we can get more info.
- I have this feeling that if he is town, and the inactive players like TT are mafia, because of our only case on PMJ right now, they don't want to post so we will have nothing to do but lynch PMJ.

So. To prevent such thing

##VOTE:TwistedTurtwig

I hope I am being logical here with these thoughts.
 
- I have this feeling that if he is town, and the inactive players like TT are mafia, because of our only case on PMJ right now, they don't want to post so we will have nothing to do but lynch PMJ.
Or, with the posting minimum, they really are just inactive players.
 
PMJ actually did give a case on simisand. However, giving a case on the one no one is going to vote for without making sure it is final duo to the vote lock is kind of suspicious for me. Trying to catch someone unaware and lock him in voting for simisand and thus making it harder to lynch him?

SilverSilent is still a good option next day I guess. TT still not here. GM Drac is posting but.. not actually putting his thoughts on who is scum. Keeper I suppose just keeping up with the thread and like last game would probably catch up and start contribute, I hope. That's for now from what I can think about.
I would vote PMJ but there are 2 things that currently are stoping me from doing so:

- There is a lot of votes on him with the Grimers and it's still early and we can get more info.
- I have this feeling that if he is town, and the inactive players like TT are mafia, because of our only case on PMJ right now, they don't want to post so we will have nothing to do but lynch PMJ.

So. To prevent such thing

##VOTE:TwistedTurtwig

I hope I am being logical here with these thoughts.
PMJ is the better lynch. Inactives will be modkilled, so you shouldn't worry about them right now.
 
Or, with the posting minimum, they really are just inactive players.

So? If there is a better idea what to do in the time we have I will follow. PMJ has 6 votes on him. By voting for him and ending the day early we lose a lot of time to get info. A whole weekend actually.
TGK-Did you see any modkills after D1? No, because they will post minimum posts to stay active and in the right moment they choose instead of being pressured. I'm not talking about Growlithe here.
 
I don't mind to vote PMJ now if you think we really don't need that time. I'll wait to see what others are thinking.
(You're always so active when I'm at work!)
 
Tgk you used your ability to make sure you stay alive if we lynch you today, right? I just want to know if you can use it on the next day because while I want to vote PMJ I am worried that we could lose the benifits of lynching you then having the benefits of you existing during the next day to tell us a lot.
 
Tgk you used your ability to make sure you stay alive if we lynch you today, right? I just want to know if you can use it on the next day because while I want to vote PMJ I am worried that we could lose the benifits of lynching you then having the benefits of you existing during the next day to tell us a lot.
I can't use it again. And I only used it because I had to activate all of mine
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top