RE: Why do people hate so much the 5th Gen?
Zalman and Metalizard you both make good points. Most of the complaints I see about gen 5 are that they "don't look like Pokemon" and that makes no sense. As I said, the one and only Pokemon I could ever compare with a Digimon or something from another monster series is Blastoise, and that was in Gen 1.
From my own personal standpoint though, if Gen 4 was the first one, I seriously doubt I'd get into Pokemon in the first place. I was always a weird girl who was into monsters and villains and bugs and such. Gen 1 had a nice variety of weird creatures like Hypno and Alakazam, dangerous looking carnivores like Charizard and Nidoking, menacing bugs like Pinsir and Scyther, and "unconventionally cute" things like Weedle and Magnemite. So it really appealed to me on many different levels.
Of course, it also had rats, horses, and other lame cutesy stuff like Jigglypuff. But it was at least balanced between monstrous and cute, as was the 3rd gen. Where as Gen 4 is mostly cutsey wutesy herbivorous mammals, plants and fish. The latter 2 being stupid even from an unbiased perspective, as there are already WAY too many grass and water types, and of those over-abundant grass and water types, most of them are plants and fish -.-
Thankfully Gen 5 is bringing the balance back though. From my own personal perspective I see them sort of like this:
-Gear and Kurumiru are like Gen 1 style monsters
-Denchura and Shijika are like Gen 2 style
-Meguroko, Desukan, and Gigiasu are more of a Gen 3 style
-Emonga, Shimama, Yanappu, Chillarmy and the Minezumi line are Gen 4 style (bleh)
Then monsters like Rankurusu, Gochiruzeru, Koromori, Zoroark, Wooguru, Muuna line, Kibago line and Moguryu line have that new Gen 5 style vibe to them which I love. Those are just my views on the Gen 5 designs anyways, I'm not saying they deliberately modeled them after past gens or something, lol.