Search results

yea, you're better off just killing the metangs as they pop., or wrecking havoc with baby ninetales before they can set one up

i dunno, i find a combination of battle compressor + 4 vs seekers is more nuts. it occupies no bench space and doesn't give 2 prizes.

that's a fairly good observation, guess most people here myself included have been playing with 61-66 card decks!

can we use cards that haven't come out yet? in such case... opponent has 1 prize card, you have the omnipresent vileplume and dual brains, your enemy has a lightning weak basic EX in front(gyarados EX works) and a shining legends venusaur in the back, attached to them are 56 basic grass...

yea, the wording on garbotoxin is fairly explicit in this case " each Pokémon in play, in each player's hand, and in each player's discard pile has no Abilities (except for Garbotoxin)." so if you had 4 garbodors and an octillery, only the garbodors should take damage (since all garbotoxins...

well... let him get trounced then, some people learn the hard way (or don't learn at all) isn't there a place nearby where people get together to play? or is your deck like pure proxy or something?

ah that's perfect, i admit i didn't check the compendium for this one. that's a good way to put it, i knew that attackers effects trigger before defender HP, i just thought that since ninetales' was an ability it was an "always on" kind of thing, thinking of abilities as things that trigger...

works for me i guess, on that note, what about turtonator GX's attack that places an effect on him(shell trap), would that be ignored by baby ninetales (since it is the effect of an attack made by a GX pokemon, or it won't since the effect is placed on turtonator and is no longer an attack/the...

yea, i'd like to know if there's a reason or an order for this, only thing i can think of is "espeon's attack applies before the defending pokemon is even checked, and due to it's wording it then ignores anything on said pokemon that may change the damage" but if i could get more confirmation...

baby ninetales has an ability that says: "Prevent all effects of attacks, including damage, done to this Pokémon by your opponent's Pokémon-GX or Pokémon-EX." meanwhile espeon EX has an attack that says: "This attack's damage isn't affected by any effects on your opponent's Active Pokémon."...

unfortunately, the attack takes 3 energy, too slow and weak to really hurt, by t3, most people would have already ko'ed her

glaceon X only works when active, also leafeon RR.

of course, he has to mention the order in which he wants the events to occur, if he flipped the burn coin, he would have to put the dmg, and he get's his tangrowth ko'ed because he forgot to heal first.

think for example a rayquaza c deck, discarding could be useful, or, as mentioned, not discarding would get weezing parlyz, so that would mean no prize.

that is a true shame then, for a minute i thought i was onto something. T_T

okey, i just noticed this, as you know, tool cards say "equip this to a pokemon that doesn't already has a tool attached." the entire meta is basically one tool per pokemon... ...HOWEVER the equip unowns (guard and quick) don't mention that part. does it mean i can, let's say, attach an energy...

nowhere in the card says anything about becoming a trainer, so common sense would dictate that it wouldn't be discarded.

http://www.pokebeach.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=63299 my thread, asking the same thing. the power says if you do, meaning you do the discarding first, then remove, or if there isn't anything to remove, just discard.

yep, there are some attacks that say: you may do X damage to Y pokemon instead, in that case, the attack hits the Y pokemon for X damage, and the number next to the attack is negated.