No; they're based off specific Pokemon. Get it right.Decks are based off types and that is fact.
Type is a factor, yes, but that is not the basis of a deck.
No; they're based off specific Pokemon. Get it right.Decks are based off types and that is fact.
signofzeta said:pfft, yeah, so you are saying that since decks aren't based off types, that is, the color of the card frame, that it means everybody's deck has cards in thier deck from all the colors of the rainbow. I'd like to see how your deck isn't based off type, and I better see at least one pokemon of each type in your deck.
Decks are based off types and that is fact. Why do you think people make fire fighting, or grass lightning decks? By making basic dragon energy, you are essentially adding another common type, and thus making it harder to pull a pokemon card of a certain type from a booster pack. If you say buy singles or trade, mind as well not have the cards packaged in boosters and just ship them in bulk to card stores just so people could buy singles.
Notice I never mentioned anything about being harder to pull a certain energy card? I think you are making up a response without fully reading what I have to say. I will say it again. Making basic dragon energy would mean that the dragon type would just be the ninth official common type. Making only special energies would mean that dragon types are more uncommon than they already are. It is also stupid that when you crack a booster, and there is no certain card of one type, it would be a wasted $4. Adding another type, that is as common as the other 8 types, would make it even worse. If dragons had attacks that used at least 2 of the existing 8 energies, the attack would be harder to use, and the fact of the matter is, dragons as a whole won't be as dominating, and like in the games, dragons should be a rare sight.
Ok, if trading for energies is the best way to go, then are you going to pay for my shipping and insurance? I didn't think so. The fact of the matter is, some places do not have a thriving pokemon community. The fact that you are getting even more basic energies doesn't matter. There is a thing called garbage, or donation. There are others out there who can't even obtain any basic energy other than from theme decks, and even then, it makes it a rip off and harder to obtain certain types, so yes, energy is hard to obtain when there isn't a thriving pokemon community around you, so don't go saying that just because you can get that many energy cards, that everybody could do it. Last time I checked, in the entire city I live in, none of the hobby stores sell pokemon singles, and a lot of players play Magic and Yugioh.
SuperMatt142 said:I'm hoping they don't go the way of the React Energy to add some effect if React is attached and if the attack has some bonus React-esque effect. That gimmick failed... whereas Rainbow energy variants have been relatively successful, even if they have gone by several names (Rainbow, Double Rainbow, Miracle, Prism... etc).
Mudkip4321 said:Sorry, I typed that when my head was hurting. But you've definetly got it. I didn't include Swablu+Altaria in my list because of the whole "pure dragon" thing. (I know that Swablu isn't a Dragon.) On top of that, Altaria (and Kingdra for others) don't really "look" like dragons. That's why I didn't include them in my list. I'm really sorry if I confused anybody!
zoradude said:But if you see colorless for an attack cost, you can use any energy. And why colorless pokemon have a rainbow design on the cards; they pretty much are multienergy already. That's kind of the concept. Dragon, though wouldn't mean "rainbow". Colorless IS that already. Dragon is just another type.
I liked the React Energy gimmick as well - the problem with it was, as you stated, it only stuck around for one set. If it stuck around for a little while longer it would have been more interesting.I found React Energy to be incredibly fun. I was somewhat disappointed to see that it only stuck around for one set.
DNA said:No; they're based off specific Pokemon. Get it right.
Type is a factor, yes, but that is not the basis of a deck.
Thanks for missing the point; it really helps.Ok then, make a deck that has all 8 types of pokemon in it, and of course base it off one particluar pokemon, and expect to win. You can't.
DNA said:Thanks for missing the point; it really helps.
When considering a deck, you first decide what your main focal Pokemon (usually singular, sometimes plural) will be, and then once you do that, build the deck around that, looking at the Pokemon cards themselves to see what goes well with them.
An example: My Gigas build utilizes the following types of Pokemon: {W}{F}{M}{P}{C} . Granted, Gigas himself takes 3 types of energy to attack, but that's beside the point - plus it doesn't explain why the Psychic types are there. He is just run with cards that go well with him. SP decks are even more varied, going as far as {L}{F}{C}{P}{R} and occasionally seen are {G}{W}{D}{M} . See? All 9 types accounted for. And as mentioned before, The Truth contains {L}{W}{R}{F}{C}{G}{P}, and not all of those are doing attacking - Reuniclus and Vileplume are there solely for the effects they provide.
It's like the DP-on and MD-on formats - Claydol, and later the pixies, were staples in pretty much EVERY deck. Type doesn't usually mean a whole lot when considering what to put in a deck.
D.N.A said:Yes, but Conkeldurr and Gigalith had just, only one set earlier, had their pre evolutions made into cards. They were still playable.
There is no Swablu card in rotation (nor Seadra/Horsea) in Japan, therefore Altaria and Kingdra cards would be completely redundant until the release of another set.
DNA said:Cyrus' Conspiracy and Roseanne's Research.
Nowadays those cards are out of rotation, so granted, people are running less varied types of Energy now, due to the lack of reliable search available. (This might change with Next Destinies, when we are getting Cilan - a supporter that searches your deck for 3 Basic Energy cards.) So right now in the current format, running a deck with 8 kinds of Energy would, yes, be impractical. That's why most decks nowadays are either mono-type or dual-type (and occasionally triple-type), in respect to attackers. (Techs are not included in my calculation.)
The exact cards and fashion that we build our decks changes with the format we are in, and what Trainer cards we have available to us. Times change, and we must adapt.
I...think we're done here on the subject? ...unless you have something more to say.
TacoTurtle said:Is the entire HS block now banned in Japan? If it is this makes sense, but if they are still playing HS-on (which I think they are, seeing how it is the official format right now and the format for Worlds) then they have both Swablu from Triumphant and Horsea/Seadra from Unleashed.
DNA said:That definitely makes sense. The different energy requirements will make them a bit more powerful as a result, because the energy will be a bit trickier to get.
That's why I'm hoping any Dragon Energy that gets released will be Special and have an effect when attached to a Dragon. But that's just me.
DNA said:or you could play special land cards, or better yet, play that red+blue card (which I forgot the name of) that exiles a card from your deck and plays it 4 turns later at no cost
I know when {D} and {M} first came out they were quite powerful - Sneasel in particular - and they did not have any Basic Energy cards to their name for years. This, consequently, made them very tricky to play. Perhaps Dragons will be the same way? In any case, if they do ever end up making Basic Dragon Energy...not yet. Please, not yet. Not for a long time.
DNA said:Not really.
Then again, I wasn't around for Hoenn at all, so my opinion doesn't mean a whole lot.
DNA said:I like that idea a lot. I'd definitely like to see that. It'd definitely be balanced enough, and not have things go totally out of control. Then again, I'm fine with Dragon just being a single Rainbow too, but we'll see.