#4: Is intelligent design a viable argument for the existence of God?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Forum Shark said:
Bippa201 said:
This reminds me of a discussion I had in school. xD

I believe in God and support everything he stands for. If you were to read the bible, which IMO is more important to christian than God himself is, you would learn that the cross was only a microscopic part of God. God didn't even die on the cross...

It does appear unstable and full of loopholes, but that alone is what makes it IMO great. Just tell yourself that you believe in it and you'll live forever.

For those that choose not to believe, one day in the blink of an eye, every Christian will leave earth and the 7 years of heck will begin. Grasshoppers will be the size of horses, water will turn into blood, and Satan's commander will go on a 7-year killing spree. If he puts a number on you, you die like that. At the end of the 7 years, God will destroy the earth and move heaven down in its place. It will be a wonderland. Fruit will instantaneously grow back when picked, money will be gone and there will be no sorrow. Doesn't that sound like an awesome place to live? I think it does

In the end, it comes down to whether or not you're willing to sacrifice 30 seconds of your life to tell God you want to follow him. That's all it takes.

Please don't misrepresent Christianity. Jesus did die on the cross, and I think God is more important than the bibe. Without the Bible, God still exists, but withoug God, the Bible would not exist.

Also, "Satan's leader" is not so. It is the antichrist you are speaking of. He is not Satan's incarnate, not will he know he is doing anything wrong. (At least I don't think. He will be acting on his beliefs).

The antichrist's "job" is to bring as many people to heck with him in the last years of the earth, not to kill everyone. I think this goes on for 7 years, and then, in a thousand years after that, God will create the new heaven and the new Earth.

I must thank all who have participated in this thread. You've made me really question what I believe, and now I am more certain of my faith. Thank you.

All right, I'm going to add my piece in here.

To the last statement. How exactly did this strengthen your faith? Does it satisfy you to know that the claims you've made were backed with nothing but belief and not facts? At least your opponents made an attempt at getting their point across correctly. Until you or anyone else presents concrete evidence - not claims back by assumption - I will keep my atheistic viewpoint and not even consider what you are saying. As of now, all it is is regurgitated and biased presumption made by you and others arguing for your religion.
 
Forum Shark said:
afstandopleren said:
*Sigh* The amount of 'Oh NOEZ, my FAITH is being WRONGED and being proved to be nothing more then a lie because of some logic that is out of my faith's reach!' is starting to get 6000 years old. >_>

*sigh* The senseless comments that don't add to discussion at all!

I am contributing. I am pointing out the the people that are addicted to their believes are taking defensive stances all over the thread when there is just as much as a little shred of evidence that proofs God wrong, or just simply illogical. Something that's annoying but tells more about the believers that think they are about to loose their faith in something that's possibly fake or non existent.

Oh and btw, this isn't the first time I said this in this thread.

Time for some word play that applies to such kind of people: Cristinsanity.
 
Noobnerd said:
I reject the Bible stating that the Earth is 6000 years old. No where in the Bible does it explicitly say that it is 6000 years old indeed, and this is simply the interpretation of some Christians.

It is hard to believe the bible. You can't honestly believe the world is 13, 000 years old and fossils have been put on to this Earth to trick us.

The best way of putting it into context is.

God created the Earth and humans coexisted with Dinosaurs (hard to believe if there is no human fossils which date back so far)

Or

God created the Earth and there was dinosaurs and so on. Then he created Adam and Eve to live on Earth (more feasable)
 
I'm going to kind of shift this a bit. I think we've talked about this before, but it didn't really get anywhere. I'm going to ask you atheists a few questions: How can you account for morality? How do you know something is right or not? (Not just refering to morals. I mean anything.) How do you know you're not all in some "matix world" and nothing is real? Where does logic come from?

As Christians, we can account for this. The Bible, so God, (not saying Blible is God) says what is right and wrong. As atheists, I am curious to hear you view.
 
^Everyone has their own set of moral values.

And I am not an atheist.

EDIT: With so many religions and philosophies, and with no concrete proof other than dogma to assert that the Bible is THE correct set of guiding principles, you can't say that Christians are the only moral people in the world and the rest are not good.
 
apophys said:
Offtopic: Atlantis has been discovered with Google Ocean.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/google/4731313/Google-Ocean-Has-Atlantis-been-found-off-Africa.html

There are like 100 places where Atlantis could have been. On the link is only a discription how it's found (with googleEarth). No other evidence. And i've seen the place by myself on googleEarth, it's pretty small for atlantis, isn't it? And Telegraph.co.uk says too that UFO's are discovered... So i think we can say Atlantis hasn't been found yet...

EDIT: It also states: ''the city sank beneath the ocean after its residents made a failed effort to conquer Athens around 9000 BC'' 9000 BC??? If i'm right Athens started around 1000 BC, that's a difference of 8000 years!
 
Forum Shark said:
I'm going to kind of shift this a bit. I think we've talked about this before, but it didn't really get anywhere. I'm going to ask you atheists a few questions: How can you account for morality? How do you know something is right or not? (Not just refering to morals. I mean anything.) How do you know you're not all in some "matix world" and nothing is real? Where does logic come from?

As Christians, we can account for this. The Bible, so God, (not saying Blible is God) says what is right and wrong. As atheists, I am curious to hear you view.

1. Most animals have instinct not to cause harm to their own species. This includes humans.
2. Don't know about that but I'll look it up.
3. We don't know that though, do we?
4. Same as 2.
 
Noobnerd said:
^Everyone has their own set of moral values.

And I am not an atheist.

EDIT: With so many religions and philosophies, and with no concrete proof other than dogma to assert that the Bible is THE correct set of guiding principles, you can't say that Christians are the only moral people in the world and the rest are not good.

Okay, so a murderer and/or child molester is doing nothing wrong because they believe it is right? I can slaughter my family, then, and the police have no right to arrest me? Is that what you're saying? If so, I dare you to go and tell someone that Stolen is okay, and see what they say.

~Magma King~ said:
Forum Shark said:
I'm going to kind of shift this a bit. I think we've talked about this before, but it didn't really get anywhere. I'm going to ask you atheists a few questions: How can you account for morality? How do you know something is right or not? (Not just refering to morals. I mean anything.) How do you know you're not all in some "matix world" and nothing is real? Where does logic come from?

As Christians, we can account for this. The Bible, so God, (not saying Blible is God) says what is right and wrong. As atheists, I am curious to hear you view.

1. Most animals have instinct not to cause harm to their own species. This includes humans.
2. Don't know about that but I'll look it up.
3. We don't know that though, do we?
4. Same as 2.

1. Really? What about cannibals? There are tons of cannibalistic species. Humans included. Besides, this is not necessarily morality. What about molestation?
2. Look forward to your answer.
3. If we're in a Matrix world, what is outside of that? Is that a Matrix, too? This is never-ending, and doesn't really make sense.
4. Same as 2.
 
I don't look at this thread for a day and this happens?

Pokequaza, do some research on stuff like cosmic microwave background radiation and other stuff. There's plenty of evidence for the Big Bang and pretty much no evidence for our universe always being there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
There could of course be more universes beyond the edge of ours, but our current universe, in which our galaxy is located, has most certainly not always been there, or it must have exploded and imploded again, and is repeating this cycle.

Moving on, we need to thank Forum Shark and Bippa201 for giving us 2 prime examples of the tactics used within the Bible or Christianity to make sure people believe against all odds:

Forum shark shows us the believe in dogmas, believe only what the Bible says, and consider everything else false, or you will be defying God. This is pretty much indoctrination, it teaches close-mindedness and shuts down all scientific advance, debate, or even normal conversation about the subject. A society living based on this would be one easy to control, and it was. In the Middle Ages, people were deliberately kept dumb by these kinds of things to make sure the church remained in power, as it was the most powerful institution at the time. Forum Shark isn't debating, he's ignoring everything someone says which could jeopardise his arguments, and just keeps on stating his dogmas and biblical "truths" as means of avoiding conversation.
Know I don't hate you, Forum Shark, I just hate this system of mindless indoctrination which seems to happen way too frequently even in countries which claim to be civilised.

Bippa shows us the fear element. If you don't believe, you will not be saved by God and you will be forced to die in the hands of the antichrist so that a new world can be created. If you die as a non-believer, you will burn in the eternal depths of Hell! These claims are of course ridiculous for everyone who was not raised within this religion, but if someone tells you from birth that this is the undeniable truth, you will believe it, and you will be afraid, as you are not capable of thinking rationally at that point. If you threaten someone with something extreme, and he or she believes you, you can pretty much make this person do everything you say will save him from this terrible faith which will otherwise befall him. Giving someone the promise of reward when this person does do what you ask him or her to will increase the chances of him or her obeying you even more.
Fear is an easy way of controlling people, as nobody wants any harm to befall them, especially not for enternity.

These exact same tactics are used for suicide terrorists to make sure they're even willing to blow themselves up for something they believe for no rational reasons.

Rationality is what dragged us out of the dark ages, dragged us out of the time of witch hunts and the Spanish inquisition, and brought us a modern age based upon science, technological advances and democracy. Of course your precious book will claim that all of this is unnecessary, as heavens await you anyway, but at least you can see, hear and feel this, it is as real as it gets. Just try to live in reality for once, instead of believing a single book and using it as an easy answer for everything, this cannot be considered rational from ANY possible point of view, except for your own. Open your eyes, please.
Religion may seem like it answers all questions, but in reality it just hides the question and replaces it with a more vague one, "who is God", "Is he real?", and so on. You're not answering a question, you're slapping the label "God" on it and calling it a day.

As for the post before you last one, Forum Shark.
1st of all, groups of animals with morals (not killing each-other, sharing food, and so on) will obviously be superior to groups of animals which aren't, so these morals will be passed on, natural selection, as explained a million and one times before in this thread. Morals can be considered a perfectly natural psychological evolution, and is part of the focus of a field of (semi-)science call evolutionary psychology.
And I have no morals, as I am a fiendishly evil, demonic, baby-eating atheist, duh.
But seriously, to me, morals are based upon not doing to others what you don't want others to do upon yourself. The discussion about morals was a while back, you can read it a few pages ago, but I could also link you to quite a few videos if you wish.

And yes, as Christians, you have "answers" based solely upon dogmas, no evidence, no research, nothing. Nothing but a single book, written by a bunch of people, in the bronze age, a time where people didn't even understand basic things like electricity, gravity, energy, speciation, or even rain and wind.

But there's also something you refuse to accept, not having an answer for something. I can't perfectly explain morals, and I will be the 1st to admit this. I would love to know, and admire those people who research this, but I wouldn't go as far as making up an answer, or accepting an answer which is not backed up by anything. Learn to accept that we're not omniscient, the quest for knowledge is an exiting one, and you're withholding yourself from it based on some irrational belief in some deity conceived by men, and that's just being stubborn and narrow-minded.

I know debating with you 2 is probably futile, as indoctrination is very hard to undo. I just hope that you will at least consider what I said, and maybe try to think of a world without a God, learn how rational and logical science can be, and abandon relying on a single book to answer all your questions. Don't give in to fear or false promises, just, please, for once, THINK.
 
HS, just point something out...

It's not good to put all your faith in Science. Yes, there are many things that science gets right, but because we're not perfect, theres a lot of things it gets wrong. Meting somewhere in the middle is the best option IMO. No where does it say that you can't have science AND religion. >_>
 
DarthPika,
There's a point where we can stop being "Oh, is it really right? You know, we don't have 100% black on white evidence, we're not absolutely certain" and accept something as true for as long as there are no counter arguments. Even if we live in a mythical fantasy world or some computer program, at least science helps up figure out how everything works, which is why I rely on science. If it weren't for science, we wouldn't have stuff like electricity, computers, internet, space travel, and so on. The point of science is constant criticism and re-evaluation anyway, you can't blindly believe in science because science itself doesn't blindly believe in science. Religion, however, has absolutely no evidence supporting it, doesn't show us how this world works, and brings us nothing but fancy stories about another world.
Religion, by definition, does not give us insight in how this world works, and therefore seems irrelevant to me. There might be people who claim they peeked outside of the box (prophets), but why would you believe them, and which one would you believe?
 
DarthPika said:
HS, just point something out...

It's not good to put all your faith in Science. Yes, there are many things that science gets right, but because we're not perfect, theres a lot of things it gets wrong. Meting somewhere in the middle is the best option IMO. No where does it say that you can't have science AND religion. >_>

I am a firm believer of God but I have entrusted everything I believe in within Science as that explains the Universe's intricate design.

I as you say 'Meet' between the middle and I agree that you can have the best of both.
 
Heavenly Spoon :F said:
I don't look at this thread for a day and this happens?

Pokequaza, do some research on stuff like cosmic microwave background radiation and other stuff. There's plenty of evidence for the Big Bang and pretty much no evidence for our universe always being there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
There could of course be more universes beyond the edge of ours, but our current universe, in which our galaxy is located, has most certainly not always been there, or it must have exploded and imploded again, and is repeating this cycle.

Well i did a lot of research. I believe that the Big Bang created OUR universe, where we live in. But I believe too that time and space are both infinite, always existed and will never end. So yes that makes me believe there have to be more universes next to ours. But the point I don't understand is: Are these universes next to us, like (if we could travel very fast) it will be possible to travel from one to another. Or are these (like ''other dimensions'') very hard to enter (impossible?) and so not just a easy walk from one to the other. I know our universe exists out of Solar-Systems - Galaxies (Galaxys?) - Clusters - Super Clusters etc. When do other universes come?

Btw nice post! I really like the way you tell those things :)
 
Well there may be a chance of many other universe's if our one is limited ( I think Steven Hawkins made a theory about this, correct me If I am wrong). What was everything before the Big bang? Just atoms? Space?
 
I have no idea how the expansion of the universe would induce the flow of time, I'd be interested to learn the theories behind this, though. I'll need to look it up someday. I can't give you an answer, sorry...
But if the flow of time is indeed created by the expansion of the universe, going outside of the universe would probably stop the flow of time or something, which seems rather weird.
I've heard of theories which state that when (and if) the universe implodes again, time will flow backwards. This seems immensely hard to imagine, gravity would have an opposite effect on falling objects (apples going towards trees and merging with them, only to become flowers and then disappear) but have an identical effect on objects circling around a planet (the moon would just go backwards), and light would spawn from objects and travel to a light source... So you know, I really doubt that, it just seems too weird. I do generally accept the possibility of everything returning back to the point of origin after a while, a big squish.

But I don't know much about spacetime and everything, so yeah, sorry.

Kash, we don't know what happened or was before the Big Bang, but absolute vacuum would probably be the most likely, that, or an immense cluster of universes all filling up everything, I wouldn't know.
 
I know that the universe is expanding but can you limit its expansion? I guess one day it may stop we may never know. Maybe when it implodes, it just creates a massive blackhole which sucks everything. That would be cool ^^
 
Well, the universe constantly uses its energy to expand, when it has used all of it, it stops expanding, and will probably collapse. There are theories which state that it won't ever reach this point, though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
 
Speaking as somebody who studies astrophysics for a degree, I can safely say that if the Universe began to contract, the flow of time would not reverse. Just throwin' that in there :p
 
Wow so if it stops expanding that means no life, ouch!

scampy said:
Speaking as somebody who studies astrophysics for a degree, I can safely say that if the Universe began to contract, the flow of time would not reverse. Just throwin' that in there :p

What would happen, would we just die, or would time go forwards, please elaborate.
 
scampy said:
Speaking as somebody who studies astrophysics for a degree, I can safely say that if the Universe began to contract, the flow of time would not reverse. Just throwin' that in there :p
I figured :F

Just wanted to throw that in there, don't remember where I read that, though...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top