d master342 said:You just joined here, CP. You don't even know half the members I do. >..>
Who cares if you're a good player?? I take everything into account, and I don't care who says they're the best. People who do that are just n00bs.
dmaster out.
Captain Petey said:Psychic Pokemon Master said:Steven's Advice is from EX Power Keepers..
Anyway, I'm kinda surprised that no one mention the LatiS from EX Holon Phantom....
@ Capt. Petey: Actually HP isn't as bad as you think. Some of the cards in HP are widely used. For example; Rare Candy(DUH!!), Flygon δ, Lati-Lock & etc. As for PK, it is actually a bad set. Most of the cards in this set are reprinted & only some manage to shine like Delcatty PK while the rest being left behind. You may consider Blaziken PK but sadly, Typhlosion MT outshine it. The fossils might make an impact IF the future Kabutops and/or Omastar is an Archetype & the only pokemon-ex that is useful is Absol ex...
At the time we also had the emerald Rare candies so we never really needed the hp ones lolz But your right in many ways. The latis forgot about them lolz HP wasnt used that widely but it did make 2 great archtypes in delta and r gon but most of the rest of the set is pretty bad. Its worst set in the legal format now which is by far HP though.
PK now blaziken is better, as the GE blaze is just incredible and all of a sudden it outshines ty. Omastar d may make a little of a impact, tops is the worst tops though and is just bad lolz. Absol ex did make pk
He doesn't have two accounts. lol. And ty was better then blaze before but now the roles have really switched with the new blaze.d master342 said:I wasn't even directing that comment at you. And for the last time, don't bash other members. Oh, I see you have two accounts. ://
dmaster out.
Psychic Pokemon Master said:How can you compare Blaziken GE with Typhlosion MT??
Both of their attacks are different & the reason why I compare Blaziken PK & Typhlosion MT is because of their Poke-Power & not to mention, Typhlosion MT attack can be used to counter Water Pokemon like Empoleon which is more useful than Blaziken PK's attack if you ask me. As for Blaziken GE, of course it is better if you play it with Blaziken PK since both of them evolve from the same pokemon but playing it with Typhlosion MT is not really a bad thing either as it can be used to counter Water Pokemon...
Serjent_Tankian said:Yes because every fire deck wants to run a bulky 3-2-2/1 stage 2 line. No, Blazkein Pk is still crap this format in any deck that doesn't run blaze GE. Infact I'd still probably play Typh so I could play a 3-2-3 Blaze Ge line.
It was having a great discussion until people lost all form of common sense. And since when does a 3-2-3 and 3-2-3 take up less room and is more efficent then a 4-3-2-2 line??Serjent_Tankian said:Yes because every fire deck wants to run a bulky 3-2-2/1 stage 2 line. No, Blazkein Pk is still crap this format in any deck that doesn't run blaze GE. Infact I'd still probably play Typh so I could play a 3-2-3 Blaze Ge line.
EDIT: Yeah this thread has such great disscusion. I'm done posting here now. And yes, I would rather play 2-1-2 Typh and 3-2-3 Blazke GE. If you would rather play a 4-3-2/2 Blaze line, be my guest.