RE: Inactivity.
I already said , this idea does not reduce the no. of spam members, but gives some serious members a chance to know right from wrong. So, instead of "spamming" and being owned by others, these members can have a good start. The idea is merely to seive out nooby members from serious members.
bacon said:Making members read the rules/noobnerds guide is a good idea in theory, but the problem is we can't make sure the newer members go ahead and read it. It's not as if we're breathing over their shoulder and physically forcing them after all.
Some forums have the "wait one day until you post" policy, which will deter quite a number of spammy members just looking for... a laugh, ahem. But it would also frighten off potentially good members as well, perhaps.
I already said , this idea does not reduce the no. of spam members, but gives some serious members a chance to know right from wrong. So, instead of "spamming" and being owned by others, these members can have a good start. The idea is merely to seive out nooby members from serious members.