Oh, misread. >.>
Point still stands. Pretty sure that's not the best way to pressure.
Point still stands. Pretty sure that's not the best way to pressure.
Well in that case I guess I'll reveal a little since involves SS
Last night I sent in an action to buff bb, but today I was told Squirtle Squad was the one affected by it. I don't know if this could be the effect of some lightning rod affected caused by SS or someone redirecting actions onto SS.
Oh, misread. >.>
Point still stands. Pretty sure that's not the best way to pressure.
You mention that scattered's posts look a little different, but you don't elaborate. IDK, this feels to me like scum trying to appear as town by covering all their bases, just in case one lynch flops. You also suggest that bb isn't protown, actually providing more (not echoed!) evidence than for TGK.
Is it what you always do? I can't ever recall you pressuring that way. And yes, I do read it as scummy. It's a very easy way for you to avoid voting for your scumbuddy when you're both up for the lynch.Fine, your opinion. Is it scummy though? If this is what I always do?
This whole post is like a summery of the previous posts. A lot of what can be considered Echoing is going on there. Adding more evidence to SS' echoing in Jabber's case.
Is it what you always do? I can't ever recall you pressuring that way. And yes, I do read it as scummy. It's a very easy way for you to avoid voting for your scumbuddy when you're both up for the lynch.
SM ISO Part 1.
RVS.
RVS.
Wagon. Nothing wrong yet.
Nothing wrong yet.
Translation: I don't know if blank is scum I need to check. Blank is most likely scum but maybe he isn't but we should still lynch him. We aren't going to lynch anyone but blank today. Maybe blank is scum but I need to check that too.
Wagon. No individual thoughts.
Wagon.
Translation: I just want to make you happy by agreeing with you.
Wagon.
Important points from part one:
Stay tuned for part two.
- All he does is bandwagon and try to make people happy. And it's not like he's a new player.
- A lot of questions. Questions aren't bad but when you are asking more questions than you are analyzing then there is a problem.
- He never seems to really know what is going on. He says "I need to read back". That's cute and stuff and there's nothing wrong with that as long as you weigh in sometime. SM never weighs in with anything important or relevant.
However, when BB shows interest, he start accusing his "friend" Scattered and votes him again (2 pages after the unvote), even though Scattered had not said anything in between the two times.Yes yes. I am reassured you are one of us.
##UNVOTE: SCATTERED MIND
Who do you think is scum my brother?
##VOTE: SCATTERED MIND
SS, you responded to the first point, and not the second. Here it is, for reference.
@Squirtle Squad - Also this:
@PikaMasterJesi @Jabberwock I'm not an expert at this, as I am completely new to role madness (I do have years of experience of in person, boring Mafia). I am not a fan of any of the current cases, as most of them are based on metas I do not know about (though SS's case looks like there is very little evidence to back it up, as opposed the existent evidence for Scattered). One person, however, seems fishy to me, and that is Camoclone. Here is a weird thing I noticed about him:
He started the Scattered case:
Yet jumps off of it two pages later, as it has very little support beside a non-voting Jesi:
However, when BB shows interest, he start accusing his "friend" Scattered and votes him again (2 pages after the unvote), even though Scattered had not said anything in between the two times.
So @Camoclone, I must ask: Why did you change opinions on the case without any evidence? Because right now, I think it was because your case gained momentum and you knew it was the best way to avoid one of your fellow scum being lynched. If you don't give me a good answer, I will vote you. This is not a shallow threat.
@scattered mind There went all my evidence.
Yes it is a shallow threat. Werewolf / Mafia experience?@PikaMasterJesi @Jabberwock I'm not an expert at this, as I am completely new to role madness (I do have years of experience of in person, boring Mafia). I am not a fan of any of the current cases, as most of them are based on metas I do not know about (though SS's case looks like there is very little evidence to back it up, as opposed the existent evidence for Scattered). One person, however, seems fishy to me, and that is Camoclone. Here is a weird thing I noticed about him:
He started the Scattered case:
Yet jumps off of it two pages later, as it has very little support beside a non-voting Jesi:
However, when BB shows interest, he start accusing his "friend" Scattered and votes him again (2 pages after the unvote), even though Scattered had not said anything in between the two times.
So @Camoclone, I must ask: Why did you change opinions on the case without any evidence? Because right now, I think it was because your case gained momentum and you knew it was the best way to avoid one of your fellow scum being lynched. If you don't give me a good answer, I will vote you. This is not a shallow threat.
You actually think he defended well? It was an awful defense.The whole thing I saw with bb, which combined with the potential self redirect is why I'm voting him, was that to me
It sounds like he made that "case" to at least look like a townie making cases but then he dropped it pretty quick...
I'm now unsure about scattered, everyone seems to be riding him for being scum, but personally I don't really see it, yesterday he defended himself really well which makes him town in my eyes. Though if you think back to the avatar game there were three days in a row where the town was 50/50 split between a scum and a town player and in each example a townie was lynched. Could be what happened yesterday and scattered is scum?
I just answered why this was the case? Read up? Yes I probably was echoing someone but only because wha tgk did was incredibly scummy and deserved the vote.