RE: Pokemon Rumored To Be Retyped As Fairy
I know it's not your original list, but you edited it, right? based on what is speculated here, darkrai no, this one yes, etc., that stuff?
My intention wasn't so much see which one of those couldn't be fairy type, but rather see which ones really could be.
For example, we said before that misdreavus/mismagius makes sense because they are a banshee (a mythical creature) and a witch (it's magic), but for the life of me, I couldn't figure out why are bellossom, lilligant, whimsicott and others on that list.
That's what I was asking; not "what shouldn't be on this list?" but "why is this on this list?"
Ohman177 said:Jakeremix said:Wayyy too many.
I'm pretty sure this is the list suggested by someone else who has insider info on the fairy-type, and therefore they aren't going to defend ever single one on that list.
Yes as they said this is not my original list. Could you tell me which you find strange?
I know it's not your original list, but you edited it, right? based on what is speculated here, darkrai no, this one yes, etc., that stuff?
My intention wasn't so much see which one of those couldn't be fairy type, but rather see which ones really could be.
For example, we said before that misdreavus/mismagius makes sense because they are a banshee (a mythical creature) and a witch (it's magic), but for the life of me, I couldn't figure out why are bellossom, lilligant, whimsicott and others on that list.
That's what I was asking; not "what shouldn't be on this list?" but "why is this on this list?"