Well it's a start considering we still don't know where the DC is in the games and when we can use it.Mugi said:TomoEGoto said:I had a thought, what if the Daycare was seen abet off screen?
If anyone saw the new commercials and saw the two Pokemon in the fenced area, don't you think with the sign next to it that it could've been the Daycare or at least a ranch?
I might be wrong, but I remembered seeing two Petilil in the fenced area near the Daycare so that's why I was thinking that maybe we saw the Daycare in one of the commercials.
Hm, that being the daycare would make a lot of sense to me. Especially because the road seems to be straight.
SavvyJackal said:Wait, so they're both real?
Oh, the confusion...
Ghoster23 said:SavvyJackal said:Wait, so they're both real?
Oh, the confusion...
From what I understood of the tutorial that means they at least have been flipped or changed in some way but nothing that wasn't already there should have been added to the image.
Mugi said:Ghoster23 said:From what I understood of the tutorial that means they at least have been flipped or changed in some way but nothing that wasn't already there should have been added to the image.
Exactly, but still. I can't believe that Froakie's Evo already has been leaked. I call this fake until I have my own game, lol.
Mugi said:That's weird. I really think that Froakie's Evo is fake. But according to your analyzes, it is supposed to be real. Well... I can't believe it, it too weird looking in my opinion.
MalaMarty said:Mugi said:That's weird. I really think that Froakie's Evo is fake. But according to your analyzes, it is supposed to be real. Well... I can't believe it, it too weird looking in my opinion.
Everything's subjective, though. Some treat it's tongue-mask with disgust, when I think it's a very welcome spin on the traditional ninja motif. Everyone's entitled to their preferences, but even if it's not your cup of tea, it's extremely authentic.
MalaMarty said:Mugi said:That's weird. I really think that Froakie's Evo is fake. But according to your analyzes, it is supposed to be real. Well... I can't believe it, it too weird looking in my opinion.
Everything's subjective, though. Some treat it's tongue-mask with disgust, when I think it's a very welcome spin on the traditional ninja motif. Everyone's entitled to their preferences, but even if it's not your cup of tea, it's extremely authentic.
Blob55 said:Where do the bubbles go with Froakies evo? Seriously. They're there for two stages and then they're gone by the third?
Blob55 said:Where do the bubbles go with Froakies evo? Seriously. They're there for two stages and then they're gone by the third?
MalaMarty said:Mugi said:That's weird. I really think that Froakie's Evo is fake. But according to your analyzes, it is supposed to be real. Well... I can't believe it, it too weird looking in my opinion.
Everything's subjective, though. Some treat it's tongue-mask with disgust, when I think it's a very welcome spin on the traditional ninja motif. Everyone's entitled to their preferences, but even if it's not your cup of tea, it's extremely authentic.
Growliere said:I personally don't believe the accuracy of "image analyzers."
I hope Greninja is fake.
And I definitely don't believe the text that came along with the pics. Only 70 new pokemon, no postgame whatsoever except for catching Mewtwo and Z legendary? Fake.
Blob55 said:Where do the bubbles go with Froakies evo? Seriously. They're there for two stages and then they're gone by the third?
Blob55 said:Growliere said:I personally don't believe the accuracy of "image analyzers."
I hope Greninja is fake.
And I definitely don't believe the text that came along with the pics. Only 70 new pokemon, no postgame whatsoever except for catching Mewtwo and Z legendary? Fake.
Where does it say no post-game?
I think there are 70 MORE Pokémon, in addition to the 40-odd we've seen.
CMP said:I know this has nothing to do with the rumored leaks, not does it have any basis in anything other than a hunch...but it is speculation. I feel that between being an even-numbered generation, having such a large number of new Pokémon last generation, and Mega Evolutions, the number of new Pokémon won't be anywhere near what some of you are expecting. I could absolutely be wrong (and hopefully I am), but I get a weird feeling about the number 114. With the number revealed so far, 100 (so far the fewest a generation has introduced) seems too low, as does 107 (the number the only other even-numbered generation introduced).
Before you guys point out that I'm trying to make some kind of pattern (100+7+7), I'm not. I actually didn't even realize it until I started typing out this post. It just really seems like a logical number, given some of Gamefreak's latest choices of seemingly random numbers (107 and 156). It's fitting for a smaller generation, and would mean that there's still nearly 2/3 of the new Pokédex to discover. Plus, with the abundance of older Pokémon available, it would be a good way to introduce a few new ones each route/each of the three Kalos 'dexs...and with the rumored number of Megas anywhere between 20-50, that would being the number of "new" (using that term loosely) Pokémon to 134-164. That would be plenty of new opportunities for team building/new battle strategies, I think.
Thoughts?