RE: Werewolf XIX: Day 7 ends February 23rd
Keeper of Night said:
I was simply suggesting that if more people were active, we'd have a better chance of actually reaching a good lynch. If you really want a vote, why don't we vote off one of those people who keep popping in here to not get modkilled, and then leave? Tell me why that's not more scummy then anything I've done.
The only reason you're active is because I'm (for lack of a better word) attacking you.
I don't know, why don't we? Y'know, getting someone else lynched is a way to safe yourself from getting lynch. I give you my word that I won't find it scummy if you decide to vote for 1 of them. As I've said many a time, all I want is to lynch
somebody. Personally, I think in general, those lynches very rarely give you something to go off of, because those players usually don't post much, so you can't get a feel for who might be scum based off of those lynches.
I originally thought it was because you're normally an active player, but weren't active during that time, but the responses you've given ended up being very scummy. Now I know that you were inactive for a reason, but I'm still pushing for your lynch now because I find you scummy because of your posts.
Keeper of Night said:
I never said it was "obviously scummy." Believe me, you can see how annoyed I am with you doing the exact same thing. I try to not do that. I already told you what I found scummy about him. He claimed, got countered, and then quickly changed his claim.
But you did say "You can't expect me to NOT vote a claimed killer." (copy/pasted from post #584) which means basically the same thing.
I'm repeating what I say because if I don't, you'll act like I never said it and say I never said it. At least, that's what other people seem to do all the time. People always complain when Camoclone doesn't bring up his past reasons, so finding out that someone is annoyed by it makes it seem like there's no pleasing people at this point.
I still don't think your reasoning for lynching Grant was a good reason. If you can't say anything that you haven't already said, then you're not convincing me. And you just have to accept that. I'd like to remind you that a few days prior to him claiming Serial Killer, he claimed VT. It seems like you forgot about that.
Keeper of Night said:
Excuse me... what logical points? You have absolutely nothing against me that I haven't already addressed. I haven't explained why being a serial killer is scummy because that was never my point. I'm not scolding you, I'm stating that its a stupid idea to vote off one of the two active players. Those two players are you and me. Hell yes I want us to wait. The wolves are probably just staying "inactive" while we bash at each other. They will win this unless the players start playing.
My "logical points" being you're trying to get the town to do nothing today. Again, if you have nothing new to say about this, then don't address it. I'm only bringing it up to address one of your points.
"Addressed" is not the same thing as "convinced".
Then what
was your point? I've read all your posts after your vote for Grant several times within the last half-hour, and I still have no idea what your point it. Could you please explain it to me?
"Scolding" was just one of those big words I like to use to give my posts some variety. I guess it doesn't really fit in that context.
Read my first paragraph.
Again, I don't think we'll get anywhere tomorrow if we have no lynch, so I think we should lynch someone.
Keeper of Night said:
And you do realize that a serial killer is a harmful role against the town, right?
Not saying that's why I voted him, I've already made that clear. But just asking.
Yes, I know Serial Killers are bad for the town.
Sorry for the wall of text, and for repeating a lot of things I've said previously, but I'm trying to address everything you said, which is something you've been doing with me as well.
