elite said:how would ur sister kno!? she's not Ken Sugimori!!
Actually I heard about that too a long time ago and I'm pretty sure it's true as well.
elite said:how would ur sister kno!? she's not Ken Sugimori!!
Yes I have. The similarities are that the grass starter and treecko are both bipedal, mostly green, reptiles with big eyes. They're species is different, their body structure is different, their head structure is different, their limbs are different, their eyes are different, and besides the green their coloration is different. There has been a pig pokemon before but I don't need to explain the differences between spoink and crispybacon. And unless I missed something, there hasn't been a sea otter yet. So I fail to see how these are not new ideas.manpanda said:have u seen them?
elite said:Yes I have. The similarities are that the grass starter and treecko are both bipedal, mostly green, reptiles with big eyes. They're species is different, their body structure is different, their head structure is different, their limbs are different, their eyes are different, and besides the green their coloration is different. There has been a pig pokemon before but I don't need to explain the differences between spoink and crispybacon. And unless I missed something, there hasn't been a sea otter yet. So I fail to see how these are not new ideas.
elite said:how would ur sister kno!? she's not Ken Sugimori!!
elite said:ok, treeko/the new grass starter, they've had 5 grass starters now!!! only 5! they could make them a little bit more different!?
Chimchar15 said:Actually I heard about that too a long time ago and I'm pretty sure it's true as well.
Annihilator27 said:ok, treeko/the new grass starter, they've had 5 grass starters now!!! only 5! they could make them a little bit more different!?
A person's art style can change over time. Ken must just like the way he does it now better than the way he did it before.elite said:if they made 1000 pokemon back then (which im not saying they didnt) then how come the shading in the artwork look way different in 1st gen compared to lets say 3rd, and 4th?
elite said:if they made 1000 pokemon back then (which im not saying they didnt) then how come the shading in the artwork look way different in 1st gen compared to lets say 3rd, and 4th?
elite said:if they made 1000 pokemon back then (which im not saying they didnt) then how come the shading in the artwork look way different in 1st gen compared to lets say 3rd, and 4th?
elite said:if they made 1000 pokemon back then (which im not saying they didnt) then how come the shading in the artwork look way different in 1st gen compared to lets say 3rd, and 4th?
ok that makes sence "hey remember this for 8 years ok?" "what if i forget to draw it then?" "you won't"benny said:I'm sorry, but are you serious? They didn't make up all the art. The released art we got with Generation III was not drawn way back when they first released Generation I.
It's just the idea of the Pokemon, not the art and everything.
elite said:if they were "rough draft" then why did he publish them?
kaorusquee said:Dood, think about it. Do you draw? I do, and I KNOW my drawing style has changed from what it originally was. So, he created a bunch of pokemon when the idea was still fresh in his mind. Maybe now he doesn't like the way they looked, so he goes back and redraws them. It's not such a far-fetched idea. Look up the earliest drawings of Chikorita sometime, you'll see what I mean.
elite said:NEWS FLASH!: SNAKES don't HAVE LEGS!